Category: Voter Registration Trends

By Doug Goodman -Founder & Executive Director Nevadans for Election Reform – August 2, 2023

Voters registered to vote as Non-Partisan surpassed the number of voters registered in the Democratic Party in July becoming the largest group of active registered voters in Nevada. Non-Partisan was the only group to register voter share gains in all demographics except for a minute (one one-hundredth of a percent) gain by the Independent American Party in Washoe and among voters 55 years of age and older.

State-Wide

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	1,521	0.25%	31.69%	-0.15%
R	1,922	0.35%	29.02%	-0.10%
NP	9,198	1.54%	31.86%	0.26%
IAP	674	0.82%	4.37%	0.00%
LIB	132	0.81%	0.87%	0.00%
Other	-17	-0.04%	2.19%	-0.02%
Total not D or R			39.29%	0.24%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Clark County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	1,114	0.24%	34.07%	-0.10%
R	1,054	0.31%	25.20%	-0.06%
NP	6,839	1.52%	33.34%	0.32%
IAP	417	0.72%	4.23%	0.01%
LIB	71	0.68%	0.76%	0.00%
Other	-41	-0.12%	2.40%	-0.02%
Total not D or R			40.73%	0.31%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Washoe County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	243	0.25%	31.08%	-0.10%
R	289	0.29%	32.57%	-0.09%
NP	1,037	1.19%	28.57%	0.18%
IAP	119	0.84%	4.62%	0.01%
LIB	29	0.81%	1.16%	0.00%
Other	16	0.26%	2.00%	-0.01%
Total not D or R			36.35%	0.18

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Rural Counties (See rural county table below district tables)

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	164	0.43%	17.60%	-0.27%
R	579	0.56%	48.00%	-0.68%
NP	1,322	2.28%	27.27%	0.08%
IAP	138	1.31%	4.90%	-0.03%
LIB	32	1.38%	1.08%	-0.01%
Other	8	0.32%	1.15%	-0.02%
Total not D or R			34.41%	0.02%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

18 – 34 Year Old

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	95	0.06%	29.69%	-0.23%
R	286	0.32%	16.83%	-0.09%
NP	3,883	1.64%	45.19%	0.36%
IAP	160	0.71%	4.25%	-0.01%
LIB	47	0.68%	1.31%	0.00%
Other	-77	-0.53%	2.73%	-0.04%
Total not D or R			53.49%	0.31%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

55+

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	848	0.32%	33.96%	-0.09%
R	1,149	0.39%	38.56%	-0.08%
NP	2,278	1.39%	21.44%	0.17%
IAP	270	0.83%	4.26%	0.01%
LIB	29	0.94%	0.40%	0.00%
Other	20	0.19%	1.38%	-0.01%
Total not D or R			27.48%	0.17%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

By district voter share changes.

Congressional Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	4	0	0
Republican	4	0	0
NP	0	4	0
IAP	0	1	3
LIB	0	0	4
Other	4	0	0

In all Congressional districts (100 percent of the districts) the number of voters not affiliated with either major party exceeds the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In three (75%) of the districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

NP holds the top share in CD3.

State Senate Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	21	0	0
Republican	21	0	0
NP	1	20	0
IAP	5	10	6
LIB	2	4	15
Other	17	1	3

In all 21 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 15 (71.43%) of the 21 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

NP holds the top share in SDs 5,9,10,11,12

State Assembly Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	41	1	0
Republican	40	2	0
NP	0	42	0
IAP	8	23	11
LIB	9	11	22
Other	34	1	7

In all 42 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 29 (69.05%) of the 42 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

NP holds the top share in Ads 8,9,15,16,29,35, and 41

Rural Counties

Party	# Counties Lose Voter Share	# Counties Gain Voter Share	# Counties No Change
Democratic	12	1	2
Republican	12	1	2
NP	0	15	0
IAP	2	11	2
LIB	6	3	6
Other	7	4	5

The voter share of those not registered to either the Democratic or Republican Party increased in 14 of the 15 rural counties with an average share of 31.40 percent.

In last month’s report I asked if the Democratic Party would lose its status as the top voter bloc in July. We have the answer. The other question, will the Democratic party fall below 30 percent voter share before next year’s state primary in June remains.

By Doug Goodman -Founder & Executive Director Nevadans for Election Reform – July 4, 2023

Did the Nevada Legislature’s regular and two special sessions have an impact on voter registration? Difficult to say. However, the June voter registration numbers could allow for a reasonable assumption. Non-Partisan voter share gained almost one-half of one percent on Democratic voter share and is now less than one-quarter of one percent (0.24%) away from over-taking the Democratic Party as the leading group of active voters in the state.

Except in the rural counties, Non-Partisan was the only group to gain share. In the rurals, all parties gained, however, Non-Partisan led the way more than doubling the Republican gain. 

State-Wide

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	-779	-0.13%	31.84%	-0.16%
R	278	0.05%	29.12%	-0.09%
NP	7,386	1.25%	31.60%	0.28%
IAP	385	0.47%	4.37%	0.00%
LIB	4	0.02%	0.86%	0.00%
Other	-302	-0.72%	2.20%	-0.02%
Total not D or R			39.04%	0.26%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Clark County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	-1,113	-0.24%	34.18%	-0.21%
R	-758	-0.22%	25.26%	-0.15%
NP	5,041	1.13%	33.02%	0.25%
IAP	100	0.17%	4.22%	-0.01%
LIB	-14	-0.13%	0.76%	0.00%
Other	-296	-0.89%	2.41%	-0.03%
Total not D or R			40.42%	0.21%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Washoe County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	213	0.22%	31.17%	-0.10%
R	327	0.33%	32.66%	-0.07%
NP	968	1.12%	28.39%	0.16%
IAP	142	1.01%	4.59%	0.01%
LIB	5	0.14%	1.17%	0.00%
Other	-18	-0.29%	2.02%	-0.01%
Total not D or R			36.17%	0.16

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Rural Counties (See rural county table below district tables)

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	121	0.32%	17.87%	0.02%
R	709	0.69%	48.68%	0.24%
NP	1,377	2.43%	27.19%	0.60%
IAP	143	1.37%	4.94%	0.06%
LIB	13	0.56%	1.09%	0.00%
Other	12	0.48%	1.17%	0.00%
Total not D or R			34.39%	0.66%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

18 – 34 Year Old

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	-954	-0.60%	29.92%	-0.26%
R	-231	-0.26%	16.91%	-0.09%
NP	2,809	1.20%	44.83%	0.41%
IAP	10	0.04%	4.25%	-0.01%
LIB	-23	-0.33%	1.31%	-0.01%
Other	-200	-1.35%	2.77%	-0.05%
Total not D or R			53.17%	0.34%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

55+

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	301	0.12%	34.05%	-0.11%
R	593	0.20%	38.64%	-0.10%
NP	2,333	1.45%	21.27%	0.21%
IAP	270	0.83%	4.25%	0.02%
LIB	11	0.36%	0.40%	0.00%
Other	-48	-0.45%	1.38%	-0.01%
Total not D or R			27.30%	0.22%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

By district voter share changes.

Congressional Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	4	0	0
Republican	4	0	0
NP	0	4	0
IAP	1	2	1
LIB	1	0	3
Other	4	0	0

In all Congressional districts (100 percent of the districts) the number of voters not affiliated with either major party exceeds the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In three (75%) of the districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

NP holds the top share in CD3.

State Senate Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	21	0	0
Republican	20	1	0
NP	0	21	0
IAP	8	10	3
LIB	9	10	2
Other	20	1	0

In all 21 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 15 (71.43%) of the 21 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

NP holds the top share in SDs 5,9,10,11,12

State Assembly Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	42	0	0
Republican	42	0	0
NP	1	41	0
IAP	19	18	5
LIB	16	11	15
Other	36	4	2

In all 42 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 29 (69.05%) of the 42 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

NP holds the top share in Ads 8,9,15,16,29,35, and 41

Rural Counties

Party	# Counties Lose Voter Share	# Counties Gain Voter Share	# Counties No Change
Democratic	13	1	1
Republican	14	1	0
NP	1	14	0
IAP	5	8	2
LIB	6	5	4
Other	7	3	5

The voter share of those not registered to either the Democratic or Republican Party increased in 14 of the 15 rural counties with an average share of 31.06 percent.

If the trend continues; being a multi-year trend there is no reason to believe it won’t, will the Democratic Party relinquish its voter share lead this month? Will the party fall below 30 percent voter share before next year’s state primary in June?

By Doug Goodman -Founder & Executive Director Nevadans for Election Reform – June 5, 2023

Both the Democratic and Republican Party continued their voter share decline in May with Non-Partisan getting closer to over-taking the Democratic Party as the group with the greatest voter share. Voter roll maintenance in Humboldt, Lincoln, and Nye County helped the major parties in those counties.

State-Wide

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	-216	-0.04%	32.00%	-0.01%
R	-2,889	-0.52%	29.22%	-0.15%
NP	3,418	0.58%	31.33%	0.18%
IAP	44	0.05%	4.36%	0.00%
LIB	-53	-0.32%	0.87%	0.00%
Other	-374	-0.89%	2.23%	-0.02%
Total not D or R			38.79%	0.16%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Clark County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	1,178	0.25%	34.38%	-0.16%
R	834	0.24%	25.41%	-0.12%
NP	7,194	1.64%	32.77%	0.30%
IAP	547	0.96%	4.23%	0.01%
LIB	53	0.51%	0.77%	0.00%
Other	-46	-0.14%	2.44%	-0.02%
Total not D or R			40.21%	0.29%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Washoe County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	205	0.21%	31.27%	-0.12%
R	243	0.24%	32.73%	-0.12%
NP	1,241	1.46%	28.23%	0.24%
IAP	115	0.83%	4.59%	0.01%
LIB	23	0.65%	1.17%	0.00%
Other	-2	-0.03%	2.02%	-0.01%
Total not D or R			36.00%	0.24

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Rural Counties (See rural county table below district tables)

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	-1,599	-4.03%	17.84%	0.21%
R	-3,966	-3.70%	48.43%	0.75%
NP	-5,017	-8.13%	26.59%	-0.85%
IAP	-618	-5.61%	4.88%	-0.02%
LIB	-129	-5.28%	1.08%	0.00%
Other	-326	-11.58%	1.17%	-0.08%
Total not D or R			33.72%	-0.95%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

18 – 34 Year Old

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	-293	-0.18%	30.18%	-0.06%
R	-1,042	-1.15%	17.00%	-0.20%
NP	1,560	0.67%	44.42%	0.29%
IAP	14	0.06%	4.26%	0.00%
LIB	-49	-0.70%	1.32%	-0.01%
Other	-164	-1.09%	2.82%	-0.03%
Total not D or R			52.82%	0.25%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

55+

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	-19	-0.01%	34.17%	0.01%
R	-885	-0.30%	38.74%	-0.10%
NP	649	0.40%	21.06%	0.09%
IAP	17	0.05%	4.23%	0.00%
LIB	-19	-0.61%	0.40%	0.00%
Other	-87	-0.81%	1.40%	-0.01%
Total not D or R			27.09%	0.08%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

By district voter share changes.

Congressional Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	3	1	0
Republican	4	0	0
NP	1	3	0
IAP	1	2	1
LIB	1	3	0
Other	4	0	0

In all Congressional districts (100 percent of the districts) the number of voters not affiliated with either major party exceeds the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In three (75%) of the districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

NP holds the top share in CD3.

State Senate Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	19	2	0
Republican	19	2	0
NP	2	19	0
IAP	5	10	6
LIB	6	3	12
Other	21	0	0

In all 21 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 15 (71.43%) of the 21 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

NP holds the top share in SDs 5,9,10, and 11

State Assembly Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	37	4	1
Republican	36	6	0
NP	3	39	0
IAP	9	24	9
LIB	14	8	20
Other	38	2	2

In all 42 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 28 (66.67%) of the 42 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

NP holds the top share in Ads 8,9,15,16,29,35, and 41

Rural Counties

Party	# Counties Lose Voter Share	# Counties Gain Voter Share	# Counties No Change
Democratic	10	4	1
Republican	9	5	1
NP	4	10	1
IAP	7	5	3
LIB	7	5	3
Other	11	2	2

The voter share of those not registered to either the Democratic or Republican Party increased in 10 of the 15 rural counties with an average share of 30.73 percent (decrease of 0.82% due to list maintenance in Humboldt, Lincoln, and Nye county.

The legislative session must end tonight by midnight. How will voters view the results and will that have any impact of voter registration trends?

By Doug Goodman -Founder & Executive Director Nevadans for Election Reform – May 3, 2023

Less than one percent. With release of the April voter registration numbers, that is the difference between Democratic Party and Non-Partisan voter share. Less than one percent from Non-Partisan becoming the largest group of active registered voters in the state. 

NOTE: Elko County performed voter roll maintenance in April resulting in the decline of voters reflected in the below tables.

State-Wide

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	145	0.02%	32.01%	0.00%
R	-3,390	-0.61%	29.37%	-0.19%
NP	4,002	0.69%	31.14%	0.20%
IAP	-5	-0.01%	4.36%	0.00%
LIB	-55	-0.34%	0.87%	0.00%
Other	-210	-0.49%	2.25%	-0.01%
Total not D or R			38.62%	0.19%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Clark County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	1,259	0.27%	34.54%	-0.17%
R	935	0.27%	25.53%	-0.13%
NP	7,531	1.75%	32.47%	0.31%
IAP	540	0.96%	4.22%	0.01%
LIB	73	0.71%	0.77%	0.00%
Other	-2	-0.01%	2.46%	-0.02%
Total not D or R			39.92%	0.30%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Washoe County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	304	0.32%	31.39%	-0.09%
R	281	0.28%	32.85%	-0.10%
NP	1,071	1.27%	27.99%	0.19%
IAP	90	0.65%	4.57%	0.00%
LIB	30	0.85%	1.17%	0.00%
Other	16	0.26%	2.03%	-0.01%
Total not D or R			35.76%	0.18

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Rural Counties (See rural county table below district tables)

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	-1,418	-3.45%	17.63%	0.27%
R	-4,606	-4.12%	47.69%	0.40%
NP	-4,600	-6.94%	27.45%	-0.59%
IAP	-635	-5.45%	4.90%	-0.03%
LIB	-158	-6.08%	1.09%	-0.01%
Other	-224	-7.37%	1.25%	-0.03%
Total not D or R			34.68%	-0.66%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

18 – 34 Year Old

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	-209	-0.13%	30.24%	0.00%
R	-1,681	-1.82%	17.20%	-0.30%
NP	1,458	0.63%	44.13%	0.34%
IAP	-128	-0.57%	4.26%	-0.02%
LIB	-65	-0.92%	1.33%	-0.01%
Other	-87	-0.58%	2.85%	-0.01%
Total not D or R			52.56%	0.30%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

55+

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	238	0.09%	34.15%	-0.03%
R	-349	-0.12%	38.84%	-0.11%
NP	1,399	0.88%	20.97%	0.15%
IAP	82	0.25%	4.23%	0.00%
LIB	-1	-0.03%	0.41%	0.00%
Other	-32	-0.30%	1.41%	-0.01%
Total not D or R			27.01%	0.14%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

By district voter share changes.

Congressional Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	3	1	0
Republican	4	0	0
NP	1	3	0
IAP	1	2	1
LIB	0	0	4
Other	4	0	0

In all Congressional districts (100 percent of the districts) the number of voters not affiliated with either major party exceeds the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In three (75%) of the districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

State Senate Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	20	1	0
Republican	19	2	0
NP	1	20	0
IAP	6	10	5
LIB	4	3	14
Other	19	1	1

In all 21 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 15 (71.43%) of the 21 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

State Assembly Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	40	1	1
Republican	41	1	0
NP	3	39	0
IAP	13	20	9
LIB	14	10	18
Other	36	3	3

In all 42 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 28 (66.67%) of the 42 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

Rural Counties

Party	# Counties Lose Voter Share	# Counties Gain Voter Share	# Counties No Change
Democratic	11	4	0
Republican	8	7	0
NP	5	9	1
IAP	10	3	2
LIB	6	3	6
Other	10	0	5

The voter share of those not registered to either the Democratic or Republican Party increased in 9 of the 15 rural counties with an average share of 31.55 percent (decrease of 1.74% due to Elko list maintenance with a range 22.98 to 39.79)

Voters not registered to vote as either Democratic or Republican continue to be the largest segment of voters in the state and in Clark and Washoe Counties. Non-Partisan continue to lead among voters between the ages 18 to 34; over 52% not Democratic or Republican. With less than one percent separating Democratic and Non-Partisan voter share statewide, the looming question; when will Non-Partisan become the leading group of voters?

By Doug Goodman -Founder & Executive Director Nevadans for Election Reform – April 4, 2023

As the number of active registered voters increased by almost 15,000 in March, the combined share of voters registered as Non-Partisan or in a minor party increased its lead as the largest group of voters across the state. At the end of March, just under 40 percent of voters in the state and in Clark County fell into the group. In Washoe County it’s 35 percent and among voters 18 to 34 years of age the number is over 52 percent.  

State-Wide

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	1,889	0.32%	32.01%	-0.15%
R	1,571	0.28%	29.56%	-0.15%
NP	10,654	1.87%	30.94%	0.32%
IAP	696	0.86%	4.36%	0.00%
LIB	118	0.72%	0.87%	0.00%
Other	-13	-0.03%	2.26%	-0.02%
Total not D or R			38.43%	0.30%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Clark County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	1,689	0.36%	34.72%	-0.18%
R	1,154	0.34%	25.66%	-0.14%
NP	8,378	1.98%	32.16%	0.35%
IAP	498	0.89%	4.21%	0.00%
LIB	70	0.69%	0.77%	0.00%
Other	19	0.06%	2.48%	-0.02%
Total not D or R			39.62%	0.33%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Washoe County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	201	0.21%	31.47%	-0.11%
R	205	0.21%	32.95%	-0.12%
NP	1,156	1.39%	27.80%	0.23%
IAP	114	0.83%	4.57%	0.01%
LIB	24	0.69%	1.16%	0.00%
Other	-10	-0.16%	2.04%	-0.01%
Total not D or R			35.58%	0.23

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Rural Counties (See rural county table below district tables)

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	-1	0.00%	17.36%	-0.11%
R	212	0.19%	47.29%	-0.19%
NP	1,120	1.72%	28.04%	0.31%
IAP	84	0.73%	4.93%	0.01%
LIB	24	0.93%	1.10%	0.00%
Other	-22	-0.72%	1.28%	-0.02%
Total not D or R			35.35%	0.30%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

18 – 34 Year Old

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	299	0.19%	30.24%	-0.27%
R	240	0.26%	17.50%	-0.14%
NP	4,827	2.14%	43.79%	0.46%
IAP	187	0.84%	4.28%	-0.01%
LIB	46	0.66%	1.34%	-0.01%
Other	-33	-0.22%	2.86%	-0.04%
Total not D or R			52.27%	0.40%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

55+

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	896	0.34%	34.18%	-0.10%
R	1,001	0.34%	38.95%	-0.11%
NP	2,559	1.64%	20.82%	0.21%
IAP	268	0.84%	4.22%	0.01%
LIB	19	0.62%	0.41%	0.00%
Other	10	0.09%	1.41%	-0.01%
Total not D or R			26.87%	0.21%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

By district voter share changes.

Congressional Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	4	0	0
Republican	4	0	0
NP	0	4	0
IAP	1	2	1
LIB	0	0	4
Other	4	0	0

In all Congressional districts (100 percent of the districts) the number of voters not affiliated with either major party exceeds the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In three (75%) of the districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

State Senate Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	21	0	0
Republican	21	0	0
NP	0	21	0
IAP	4	9	8
LIB	2	2	17
Other	21	0	0

In all 21 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 14 (66.67%) of the 21 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

State Assembly Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	42	0	0
Republican	42	0	0
NP	0	42	0
IAP	12	10	10
LIB	8	10	24
Other	40	0	2

In all 42 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 28 (66.67%) of the 42 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

Rural Counties

Party	# Counties Lose Voter Share	# Counties Gain Voter Share	# Counties No Change
Democratic	13	2	0
Republican	11	4	0
NP	3	12	0
IAP	6	4	5
LIB	2	6	7
Other	11	0	4

The voter share of those not registered to either the Democratic or Republican Party increased in 12 of the 15 rural counties with an average share of 33.29 percent ( increase of 0.19% with a range 24.07 to 39.54)

We are now at the half-way point of the Nevada legislative session. On April 14^th we will know the first group of bills that will not advance. As the session proceeds to Sin Die (adjournment) on June 5^th, the question is how will the session be viewed by voters and how will that impact voter registration.

By Doug Goodman -Founder & Executive Director Nevadans for Election Reform – March 1, 2023

With the increase of active voters registered as Non-Partisan in February, the segment of active voters not registered to vote in either the Democratic or Republican Party is now the largest group of voters in two-thirds (66.67 percent) of all state legislative districts. That segment remains the largest bloc statewide, in Clark and Washoe county, and is now just under 52 percent among voters 18 – 34  years of age.

State-Wide

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	1,253	0.21%	32.16%	-0.13%
R	1,027	0.19%	29.71%	-0.13%
NP	8,481	1.51%	30.61%	0.27%
IAP	624	0.77%	4.36%	0.01%
LIB	103	0.64%	0.87%	0.00%
Other	-20	-0.05%	2.28%	-0.02%
Total not D or R			38.13%	0.26%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Clark County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	1,317	0.29%	34.90%	-0.15%
R	911	0.27%	25.80%	-0.12%
NP	6,846	1.65%	31.81%	0.29%
IAP	461	0.83%	4.21%	0.00%
LIB	75	0.74%	0.77%	0.00%
Other	-15	-0.05%	2.50%	-0.02%
Total not D or R			39.30%	0.27%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Washoe County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	-41	-0.04%	31.58%	-0.09%
R	20	0.02%	33.06%	-0.07%
NP	677	0.82%	27.57%	0.16%
IAP	62	0.45%	4.56%	0.01%
LIB	8	0.23%	1.16%	0.00%
Other	-4	-0.06%	2.05%	-0.01%
Total not D or R			35.35%	0.16

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Rural Counties (See rural county table below district tables)

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	-23	-0.06%	17.47%	-0.10%
R	96	0.09%	47.48%	-0.19%
NP	958	1.49%	27.73%	0.27%
IAP	101	0.88%	4.92%	0.02%
LIB	20	0.78%	1.10%	0.00%
Other	-1	-0.03%	1.30%	-0.01%
Total not D or R			35.05%	0.28%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

18 – 34 Year Old

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	167	0.11%	30.50%	-0.21%
R	62	0.07%	17.64%	-0.13%
NP	3,813	1.72%	43.33%	0.39%
IAP	139	0.63%	4.29%	-0.01%
LIB	23	0.33%	1.34%	-0.01%
Other	-47	-0.31%	2.90%	-0.03%
Total not D or R			51.86%	0.34%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

55+

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	528	0.20%	34.28%	-0.09%
R	668	0.23%	39.06%	-0.09%
NP	2,005	1.30%	20.61%	0.17%
IAP	231	0.73%	4.21%	0.01%
LIB	35	1.15%	0.41%	0.00%
Other	-1	-0.01%	1.42%	-0.01%
Total not D or R			26.66%	0.17%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

By district voter share changes.

Congressional Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	4	0	0
Republican	4	0	0
NP	0	4	0
IAP	0	3	1
LIB	0	0	4
Other	4	0	0

In all Congressional districts (100 percent of the districts) the number of voters not affiliated with either major party exceeds the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In three (75%) of the districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

State Senate Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	21	0	0
Republican	21	0	0
NP	0	21	0
IAP	4	11	6
LIB	3	3	15
Other	20	0	1

In all 21 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 14 (66.67%) of the 21 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

State Assembly Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	42	0	0
Republican	42	0	0
NP	0	42	0
IAP	10	23	9
LIB	11	9	22
Other	37	2	3

In all 42 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 29 (66.67%) of the 42 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

Rural Counties

Party	# Counties Lose Voter Share	# Counties Gain Voter Share	# Counties No Change
Democratic	13	1	1
Republican	14	1	0
NP	0	15	0
IAP	4	8	3
LIB	2	3	10
Other	7	1	7

The voter share of those not registered to either the Democratic or Republican Party increased in 14 of the 15 rural counties with an average share of 33.10 percent (range 23.67 to 39.87)

On March 4, 2023, the Nevada Democratic Party will hold its state party leadership election. There has been a lot of media attention given to the friction between the current leadership and the challenging slate. I have to pose the question; could the result of the election have an impact on voter share in the coming month?  

By Doug Goodman -Founder & Executive Director Nevadans for Election Reform – February 2, 2023

Voter rolls underwent routine maintenance in January with the resulting changes benefiting the Republican Party with Non-Partisan benefiting in the rural counties and among younger voters. However, the overall status of voter share did not change with those not registered in either the Democratic or Republican Party (registered as Non-Partisan or in a minor party) still being the largest segment statewide, in Clark and Washoe counties, and among voters 18 to 34 years of age with Non-Partisan being the largest in that group. Only among voters 55 years of age and older is this voter share percentage under 30 percent.

State-Wide

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	-19,404	-3.14%	32.30%	-0.10%
R	-12,954	-2.29%	29.84%	0.17%
NP	-16,863	-2.91%	30.35%	-0.02%
IAP	-2,299	-2.77%	4.35%	0.00%
LIB	-616	-3.67%	0.87%	-0.01%
Other	-2,196	-4.91%	2.29%	-0.05%
Total not D or R			37.87%	-0.08%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Clark County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	-15,083	-3.16%	35.05%	-0.06%
R	-8,617	-2.46%	25.92%	0.15%
NP	-13,366	-3.12%	31.53%	-0.03%
IAP	-1,661	-2.91%	4.21%	0.00%
LIB	-432	-4.09%	0.77%	-0.01%
Other	-1,730	-4.95%	2.52%	-0.05%
Total not D or R			39.03%	-0.09%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Washoe County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	-3,988	-4.02%	31.67%	0.01%
R	-3,853	-3.73%	33.14%	0.12%
NP	-3,698	-4.30%	27.42%	-0.07%
IAP	-584	-4.10%	4.55%	0.00%
LIB	-180	-4.91%	1.16%	-0.01%
Other	-419	-6.34%	2.06%	-0.05%
Total not D or R			35.19%	-0.13

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Rural Counties (See rural county table below district tables)

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	-333	-0.80%	17.56%	-0.09%
R	-484	-0.43%	47.67%	-0.06%
NP	201	0.31%	27.46%	0.17%
IAP	-54	-0.47%	4.90%	-0.01%
LIB	-4	-0.16%	1.09%	0.00%
Other	-47	-1.51%	1.31%	-0.02%
Total not D or R			34.76%	0.14%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

18 – 34 Year Old

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	-7,787	-4.67%	30.71%	-0.16%
R	-3,810	-3.98%	17.77%	0.03%
NP	-8,557	-3.71%	42.94%	0.21%
IAP	-979	-4.22%	4.30%	0.00%
LIB	-326	-4.46%	1.35%	0.00%
Other	-1,044	-6.44%	2.93%	-0.07%
Total not D or R			51.52%	0.14%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

55+

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	-5,251	-1.98%	34.37%	-0.09%
R	-4,777	-1.59%	39.15%	0.05%
NP	-2,316	-1.48%	20.44%	0.05%
IAP	-460	-1.43%	4.20%	0.01%
LIB	-54	-1.74%	0.40%	0.00%
Other	-397	-3.55%	1.43%	-0.03%
Total not D or R			26.48%	0.03%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

By district voter share changes.

Congressional Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	3	1	0
Republican	0	4	0
NP	2	2	0
IAP	1	3	0
LIB	3	0	1
Other	4	0	0

In all Congressional districts (100 percent of the districts) the number of voters not affiliated with either major party exceeds the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In three (75%) of the districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

State Senate Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	12	7	2
Republican	4	17	0
NP	10	11	0
IAP	7	12	2
LIB	12	2	7
Other	21	0	0

In all 21 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 13 (61.90%) of the 21 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

State Assembly Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	23	18	1
Republican	10	32	0
NP	20	22	0
IAP	18	17	7
LIB	25	6	11
Other	41	0	1

In all 42 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 25 (59.53%) of the 42 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

Rural Counties

Party	# Counties Lose Voter Share	# Counties Gain Voter Share	# Counties No Change
Democratic	9	5	1
Republican	11	4	0
NP	3	12	0
IAP	11	4	0
LIB	3	6	6
Other	4	2	9

As I write this the start of the legislative session is four days away. Will the status of voter registration be on the minds of legislators opening up more collaboration or will they stick to party lines on the important issues facing the state? We will know very soon.

By Doug Goodman -Founder & Executive Director Nevadans for Election Reform – December 31, 2022

With December voter registration numbers, voters registered as Non-Partisan or in minor parties closed out 2022 not only expanding their lead with an average growth of almost two percent over the year; Non-Partisan voter share growth averaged over two and one-half percent, but elected a new governor, lieutenant governor, and controller.  

In addition to the three races mentioned above, voters not affiliated with either the Democratic or Republican Party impacted the margin of victory of many other races. NOTE: A breakout is included with this report.

State-Wide

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %	2021 – 2022 Voter Share Change
D	632	0.10%	32.39%	-0.12%	-1.54%
R	404	0.07%	29.67%	-0.12%	-0.21%
NP	7,514	1.32%	30.37%	0.25%	2.69%
IAP	672	0.82%	4.35%	0.01%	-0.14%
LIB	50	0.30%	0.88%	0.00%	-0.07%
Other	-174	-0.39%	2.34%	-0.02%	-0.73%
Total not D or R			37.94%	0.24%	1.75%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Clark County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %	2021 – 2022 Voter Share Change
D	563	0.12%	35.11%	-0.16%	-1.71%
R	365	0.10%	25.77%	-0.12%	-0.22%
NP	6,314	1.49%	31.56%	0.29%	2.93%
IAP	516	0.91%	4.20%	0.01%	-0.13%
LIB	54	0.51%	0.78%	0.00%	-0.06%
Other	-138	-0.39%	2.57%	-0.02%	-0.81%
Total not D or R			39.12%	0.28%	1.93%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Washoe County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %	2021 – 2022 Voter Share Change
D	187	0.19%	31.66%	-0.03%	-0.90%
R	203	0.20%	33.02%	-0.03%	0.19%
NP	421	0.49%	27.48%	0.05%	1.49%
IAP	123	0.87%	4.55%	0.03%	-0.07%
LIB	5	0.14%	1.17%	0.00%	-0.09%
Other	-13	-0.20%	2.11%	-0.01%	-0.63%
Total not D or R			35.32%	0.07	0.71%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Rural Counties (See rural county table below district tables)

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %	2021 – 2022 Voter Share Change
D	-118	-0.28%	17.65%	-0.09%	-1.48%
R	-164	-0.15%	47.73%	-0.17%	-0.57%
NP	779	1.23%	27.29%	0.27%	2.77%
IAP	33	0.29%	4.91%	0.00%	-0.30%
LIB	-9	-0.35%	1.09%	-0.01%	-0.04%
Other	-23	-0.73%	1.32%	-0.01%	-0.39%
Total not D or R			34.62%	0.25%	2.05%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

18 – 34 Year Old

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %	2021 – 2022 Voter Share Change
D	34	0.02%	30.88%	-0.18%	-2.31%
R	41	0.04%	17.73%	-0.10%	-0.80%
NP	3,181	1.40%	42.74%	0.33%	4.55%
IAP	122	0.53%	4.30%	0.00%	-0.18%
LIB	4	0.05%	1.35%	-0.01%	-0.15%
Other	-122	-0.75%	3.00%	-0.04%	-1.11%
Total not D or R			51.39%	0.28%	3.11%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

55+

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %	2021 – 2022 Voter Share Change
D	183	0.07%	34.46%	-0.09%	-1.10%
R	260	0.09%	39.10%	-0.10%	0.29%
NP	1,885	1.22%	20.39%	0.18%	1.43%
IAP	280	0.88%	4.19%	0.02%	-0.15%
LIB	13	0.42%	0.40%	0.00%	-0.03%
Other	-10	-0.09%	1.46%	-0.01%	-3.89%
Total not D or R			26.44%	0.19%	0.81%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

By district voter share changes.

Congressional Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	4	0	0
Republican	4	0	0
NP	0	4	0
IAP	0	4	0
LIB	0	0	4
Other	3	1	0

In all Congressional districts (100 percent of the districts) the number of voters not affiliated with either major party exceeds the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In three (75%) of the districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

State Senate Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	20	1	0
Republican	20	1	0
NP	1	20	0
IAP	1	18	2
LIB	5	3	13
Other	20	0	1

In all 21 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 13 (61.90%) of the 21 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

State Assembly Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	40	2	0
Republican	41	1	0
NP	2	40	0
IAP	2	30	10
LIB	12	8	22
Other	35	4	3

In all 42 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 25 (59.53%) of the 42 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

Rural Counties

Party	# Counties Lose Voter Share	# Counties Gain Voter Share	# Counties No Change
Democratic	11	4	0
Republican	13	2	0
NP	2	13	0
IAP	7	8	0
LIB	6	6	3
Other	10	1	4

As we head into the legislative session, it is important to note that in sixty percent of legislative districts, voters registered as neither Democratic nor Republican is the largest voting bloc. Are legislators aware of this and how will that awareness, or lack thereof, affect the legislative process?

Impact of Non-Major Party Voters on 2022 General Election

Column Definition:

Percent – Percent of vote received

Party – Political Party of candidate

Reg % Party voter share

Diff Reg – Difference in voter share of major party candidates

Diff Vote to Reg – Difference of vote received to party voter share

Margin of Win – Percent of vote received, winner to second place candidate

Diff Margin of Win to Diff Ref – Comparison of margin of win to difference in voter share

Impact of non-major party voters can be deducted by comparing difference in voter share to margin of win. Example, Republican Party voter share is almost three percent lower than Democratic Party share yet Joe Lombardo won the race for governor by one and one-half percent.

Governor
	Percent	Party	Reg %	Diff Reg	Diff Vote to Reg	Margin of win	Diff margin of win -Diff reg
BRIDGES, ED	0.97%	IAP	4.31%		-3.34%
DAVIS, BRANDON	1.46%	LP	0.88%		0.58%
LOMBARDO, JOE	48.81%	R	29.84%	-2.82%	18.97%	1.51%	4.33%
SISOLAK, STEVE	47.30%	D	32.66%		14.64%
NONE OF THESE CANDIDATES	1.46%
Lieutenant Governor
ANTHONY, STAVROS	49.41%	R	29.84%	-2.82%	19.57%	3.66%	6.48%
CANO BURKHEAD, ELIZABETH “LISA”	45.75%	D	32.66%		13.09%
DELAP, JOHN “TREY”	0.78%	NP	29.87%		-29.09%
HOGE, WILLIAM	0.83%	IAP	4.31%		-3.48%
TACHIQUIN, JAVI “TRUJILLO”	1.13%	LP	0.88%		0.25%
NONE OF THESE CANDIDATES	2.09%
State Controller
MATTHEWS, ANDY	50.06%	R	29.84%	-2.82%	20.22%	4.13%	6.95%
PROFETA, JED W.	1.52%	LP	0.88%		0.64%
SPIEGEL, ELLEN	45.93%	D	32.66%		13.27%
NONE OF THESE CANDIDATES	2.48%
United States Senator
		Party	Reg %	Diff Reg	Diff Vote to Reg	Margin of win	Diff margin of win -Diff reg
	PERCENT
CORTEZ MASTO, CATHERINE	48.81%	D	32.66%	2.82%	16.15%	0.77%	-2.05%
LAXALT, ADAM PAUL	48.04%	R	29.84%		18.20%
LINDEMANN, BARRY	0.79%	NP	29.87%		-29.08%
RUBINSON, BARRY	0.51%	IAP	4.31%		-3.80%
SCOTT, NEIL	0.63%	LP	0.88%		-0.25%
NONE OF THESE CANDIDATES	1.22%
U.S. Representative in Congress, District 1
CAVANAUGH, KEN	2.47%	LP	0.78%		1.69%
ROBERTSON, MARK	45.96%	R	25.67%		20.29%
TITUS, DINA	51.57%	D	35.60%	9.93%	15.97%	5.61%	-4.32%
U.S. Representative in Congress, District 2
AMODEI, MARK E.	59.73%	R	39.02%	12.58%	20.71%	21.93%	9.35%
BABER, DARRYL	1.12%	LP	1.15%		-0.03%
BEST, RUSSELL	1.35%	IAP	4.63%		-3.28%
KRAUSE, ELIZABETH MERCEDES	37.80%	D	26.44%		11.36%
U.S. Representative in Congress, District 3
BECKER, APRIL	48.02%	R	27.51%		20.51%
LEE, SUSIE	51.98%	D	33.37%	5.86%	18.61%	3.96%	-1.90%
U.S. Representative in Congress, District 4
HORSFORD, STEVEN A.	52.42%	D	35.88%	9.62%	16.54%	4.84%	-4.78%
PETERS, SAM	47.58%	R	26.26%		21.32%
State Races
Secretary of State
		Party	Reg %	Diff Reg	Diff Vote to Reg	Margin of win	Diff margin of win -Diff reg
AGUILAR, FRANCISCO “CISCO”	48.95%
CRANE, ROSS	0.87%	LP	0.88%		-0.01%
HANSEN, JANINE	1.72%	IAP	4.31%		-2.59%
MARCHANT, JIM	46.67%	R	29.84%		16.83%
NONE OF THESE CANDIDATES	1.79%
State Treasurer
CONINE, ZACH	47.70%	D	32.66%	2.82%	15.04%	1.70%	-1.12%
ELLIOTT, BRYAN	1.59%	LP	0.88%		0.71%
FIORE, MICHELE	46.00%	R	29.84%		16.16%
HENDRICKSON, MARGARET	1.94%	IAP	4.31%		-2.37%
NONE OF THESE CANDIDATES	2.77%
Attorney General
CHATTAH, SIGAL	44.36%	R	29.84%		14.52%
FORD, AARON D.	52.25%	D	32.66%	2.82%	19.59%	7.89%	5.07%
NONE OF THESE CANDIDATES	3.39%
State Senate, District 2
FLORES, EDGAR	69.93%	D	44.02%	31.64%	25.91%	39.86%	8.22%
HENDERSON, LEO	30.07%	R	12.38%		17.69%
State Senate, District 8
LOOP, MARILYN DONDERO	50.72%	D	32.72%	2.94%	18.00%	1.44%	-1.50%
PAULOS, JOEY	49.28%	R	29.78%		19.50%
State Senate, District 9
		Party	Reg %	Diff Reg	Diff Vote to Reg	Margin of win	Diff margin of win -Diff reg
BROWN, TINA	46.55%	R
SCHEIBLE, MELANIE	53.45%	D	34.71%	9.95%	18.74%	6.90%	-3.05%
State Senate, District 10
CUNNINGHAM, CHRIS	3.64%	LP	0.87%		2.77%
DONATE, FABIAN	55.54%	D	36.99%	16.84%	18.55%	14.72%	-2.12%
GRAVIET, PHILIP	40.82%	R	20.15%		20.67%
State Senate, District 12
ARRINGTON, CHERLYN	47.53%	R	27.59%		19.94%
PAZINA, JULIE ANN	52.47%	D	33.33%	5.74%	19.14%	4.94%	-0.80%
State Senate, District 13
BUEHLER, MATTHEW R.	38.43%	R	23.25%		15.18%
DALY, RICHARD “SKIP”	61.57%	D	36.79%	13.54%	24.78%	23.14%	9.60%
State Senate, District 14
HANSEN, IRA	100.00%	R	43.09%		56.91%
State Senate, District 16
KRASNER, LISA	60.35%	R	40.52%	13.73%	19.83%	20.70%	6.97%
SIMS, AARON	39.65%	D	26.79%		12.86%
State Senate, District 17
TITUS, ROBIN L.	100.00%	R	49.02%		50.98%
State Senate, District 20
FOUTZ, BRENT	35.59%	D	24.79%		10.80%
MILLS, BRANDON	2.72%	LP	0.71%		2.01%
STONE, JEFF	61.69%	R	41.28%	16.49%	20.41%	26.10%	9.61%
State Senate, District 21
		Party	Reg %	Diff Reg	Diff Vote to Reg	Margin of win	Diff margin of win -Diff reg
LARSEN, APRIL	44.21%	R
OHRENSCHALL, JAMES	55.79%	D	40.30%	19.62%	15.49%	11.58%	-8.04%
State Assembly, District 1
BRINKLEY, GARLAND LEE	42.60%	R	25.86%		16.74%
MCATEE-MACRAE, PATRICK “MAC”	2.58%	NP	28.40%		-25.82%
MONROE-MORENO, DANIELE	54.82%	D	38.44%	12.58%	16.38%	12.22%	-0.36%
State Assembly, District 2
BEDNARZ, JASON	1.38%	LP	0.77%		0.61%
CHRISTENSON, NICK	44.28%	D	30.99%		13.29%
KASAMA, HEIDI	54.34%	R	32.72%	1.73%	21.62%	10.06%	8.33%
State Assembly, District 3
LEMACK, JOSHUA	44.67%	R	23.94%		20.73%
TORRES, SELENA ELIZABETH	55.33%	D	37.79%	13.85%	17.54%	10.66%	-3.19%
State Assembly, District 4
BURNS, DARBY LEE	37.38%	LP	0.88%		36.50%
MCARTHUR, RICHARD	62.62%	R	32.55%	31.67%	30.07%	25.24%	-6.43%
State Assembly, District 5
MILLER, BRITTNEY	52.88%	D	34.63%	8.11%	18.25%	7.39%	-0.72%
MORGAN, RONALD	1.64%	LP	0.76%		0.88%
QUINN, KELLY	45.49%	R	26.53%		18.96%
State Assembly, District 6
		Party	Reg %	Diff Reg	Diff Vote to Reg	Margin of win	Diff margin of win -Diff reg
RIOS, KATHRYN “KAT”	18.57%	R
SUMMERS-ARMSTRONG, SHONDRA	81.43%	D	51.40%	42.42%	30.03%	62.86%	20.44%
State Assembly, District 7
MILLER, CAMERON HOMER “C.H.”	63.45%	D	44.38%	26.68%	19.07%	26.90%	0.22%
PALMER, ANTHONY “TONY”	36.55%	R	17.70%		18.85%
State Assembly, District 8
		Party	Reg %	Diff Reg	Diff Vote to Reg	Margin of win	Diff margin of win -Diff reg
LOGAN, JENANN	44.07%	R
NGUYEN, DUY	55.93%	D	33.93%	10.54%	22.00%	11.86%	1.32%
State Assembly, District 9
FLEMING, RYAN PATRICK	46.79%	R	26.34%		20.45%
YEAGER, STEVE	53.21%	D	32.95%	6.61%	20.26%	6.42%	-0.19%
State Assembly, District 10
HERNANDEZ, SANDIE “GISELA”	41.81%	R	21.61%		20.20%
NGUYEN, ROCHELLE	58.19%	D	38.98%	17.37%	19.21%	16.38%	-0.99%
State Assembly, District 11
DURAN, BEATRICE “BEA”	73.35%	D	44.54%	33.19%	28.81%	46.70%	13.51%
KRATTIGER, ERIC	26.65%	R	11.35%		15.30%
State Assembly, District 12
CARTER, II, MAX E.	50.94%	D	38.01%	12.98%	12.93%	1.88%	-11.10%
LARSEN, FLEMMING	49.06%	R	25.03%		24.03%
State Assembly, District 13
	Party	Reg %	Diff Reg	Diff Vote to Reg	Margin of win	Diff margin of win -Diff reg
HIBBETTS, BRIAN		R					7.54%
RUCKER, WILL	44.45%	D	30.42%		14.03%
State Assembly, District 14
MOSCA, ERICA	66.00%	D	43.05%	27.58%	22.95%	32.00%	4.42%
STAMPER, SHAWN	34.00%	R	15.47%		18.53%
State Assembly, District 15
BANG, STEVEN D.	37.47%	R	16.41%		21.06%
WATTS, HOWARD	62.53%	D	38.21%	21.80%	24.32%	25.06%	3.26%
State Assembly, District 16
GONZALEZ, CECELIA	53.86%	D	35.92%	12.49%	17.94%	7.72%	-4.77%
HOLDER, JESSE “JAKE”	46.14%	R	23.43%		22.71%
State Assembly, District 17
	Party	Reg %	Diff Reg	Diff Vote to Reg	Margin of win	Diff margin of win -Diff reg
PAWLEY, III, EUGENE MICHAEL		R
THOMAS, CLARA “CLAIRE”	65.52%	D	41.67%	23.93%	23.85%	31.04%	7.11%
State Assembly, District 18
CONSIDINE, VENICIA	60.37%	D	39.51%	19.89%	20.86%	20.74%	0.85%
DECORTE, CHRISTINE	39.63%	R	19.62%		20.01%
State Assembly, District 19
YUREK, THADDEUS “TOBY”	100.00%	R	42.78%		57.22%
State Assembly, District 20
	Party	Reg %	Diff Reg	Diff Vote to Reg	Margin of win	Diff margin of win -Diff reg
LAROW, JOSIAH L.		LP
ORENTLICHER, DAVID	59.44%	D	39.92%	20.44%	19.52%	21.71%	1.27%
VAUGHAN, STAN	37.73%	R	19.48%		18.25%
State Assembly, District 21
MARZOLA, ELAINE	52.41%	D	33.39%	4.69%	19.02%	4.82%	0.13%
PETRICK, JON S.	47.59%	R	28.70%		18.89%
State Assembly, District 22
HARDY, MELISSA	58.54%	R	34.21%	4.99%	24.33%	17.08%	12.09%
RAMOS, RICK	41.46%	D	29.22%		12.24%
State Assembly, District 23
BRICKFIELD, ELIZABETH	39.60%	D	26.64%		12.96%
GALLANT, DANIELLE	58.87%	R	39.92%	13.28%	18.95%	19.27%	5.99%
MANLEY, MERCY	1.53%	LP	0.72%		0.81%
State Assembly, District 24
KING, DORZELL	34.09%	R	20.84%		13.25%
PETERS, SARAH	65.91%	D	37.88%	17.03%	28.03%	31.82%	14.79%
State Assembly, District 25
KUMAR, SAM	46.10%	R	32.74%		13.36%
LA RUE HATCH, SELENA	53.90%	D	35.17%	2.43%	18.73%	7.80%	5.37%
State Assembly, District 26
DELONG, RICH	71.71%	R	40.02%	12.47%	31.69%	43.42%	30.95%
MITCHELL, REED	28.29%	D	27.55%		0.74%
State Assembly, District 27
	Party	Reg %	Diff Reg	Diff Vote to Reg	Margin of win	Diff margin of win -Diff reg
ORTIZ, CARMEN L.		R
TAYLOR, ANGELA	58.21%	D	35.92%	10.44%	22.29%	16.42%	5.98%
State Assembly, District 28
BROWN, CLINT	32.58%	R	13.39%		19.19%
D’SILVA, REUBEN	67.42%	D	43.51%	30.12%	23.91%	34.84%	4.72%
State Assembly, District 29
COHEN, LESLEY ELIZABETH	53.14%	D	33.72%	6.63%	19.42%	6.28%	-0.35%
KNIGHTLY, RHONDA	46.86%	R	27.09%		19.77%
State Assembly, District 30
ANDERSON, NATHA C.	55.21%	D	35.71%	10.07%	19.50%	13.77%	3.70%
MCGEEIN, GARRETT	3.36%	LP	1.14%		2.22%
RODRIGUEZ-ELKINS, RICCI	41.44%	R	25.64%		15.80%
State Assembly, District 31
DICKMAN, JILL	100.00%	R	40.27%		59.73%
State Assembly, District 32
HANSEN, ALEXIS M.	100.00%	R	46.23%		53.77%
State Assembly, District 33
GARRARD, JOHN “DOC”	19.13%	D	13.04%		6.09%
GURR, BERT	80.87%	R	52.52%	39.48%	28.35%	61.74%	22.26%
State Assembly, District 34
BILBRAY-AXELROD, SHANNON	56.12%	D	37.56%	13.38%	18.56%	12.24%	-1.14%
BUTLER, STACY	43.88%	R	24.17%		19.71%
State Assembly, District 35
		Party	Reg %	Diff Reg	Diff Vote to Reg	Margin of win	Diff margin of win -Diff reg
GORELOW, MICHELLE	48.93%	D
JONES, TIFFANY	47.41%	R	28.03%		19.38%
ROBINSON, MINDY	3.66%	LP	0.84%		2.82%
			\
State Assembly, District 36
HAFEN, II, GREGORY T.	100.00%	R	40.29%		59.71%
State Assembly, District 37
BACKUS, SHEA	50.49%	D	34.08%	2.96%	16.41%	2.57%	-0.39%
DEAVILLE, JACOB	47.92%	R	31.11%		16.81%
TEDOFF, MARC	1.60%	LP	0.82%		0.78%
State Assembly, District 38
KOENIG, GREGORY S.	100.00%	R	47.24%		52.76%
State Assembly, District 39
GRAY, KEN	70.17%	R	50.52%	31.54%	19.65%	40.34%	8.80%
NOBLE, JANICE E.	29.83%	D	18.98%		10.85%
State Assembly, District 40
MCDANIEL, SHANNON C.	37.96%	D	25.96%		12.00%
O’NEILL, PHILIP “PK”	58.81%	R	41.06%	15.11%	17.75%	20.85%	5.74%
TOLL, SAM	3.23%	LP	1.22%		2.01%
State Assembly, District 41
BODINE, PAUL	46.07%	R	26.47%		19.60%
JAUREGUI, SANDRA	51.77%	D	33.28%	6.81%	18.49%	5.70%	-1.11%
MCNAMARA, SEAN	2.16%	LP	0.87%		1.29%
State Assembly, District 42
BROWN-MAY, TRACY	56.65%	D	36.56%	13.46%	20.09%	13.30%	-0.16%
FACEY, EDWARD “EDDIE”	43.35%	R	23.10%		20.25%

By Doug Goodman -Founder & Executive Director Nevadans for Election Reform – December 5, 2022

The general election last month brought Nevada a split government; three of the six Constitutional offices going to both the Democratic (treasurer, attorney general, secretary of state) and Republican Party (governor, lieutenant governor, comptroller) and the Democratic Party maintaining a super-majority in the assembly and a majority in the senate. Besides splitting their tickets, voters also continued to prefer to register to vote as members of neither major party.

Statewide, Non-Partisan voter share surpassed 30 percent increasing its lead over the GOP and just two (2) percent behind Democratic voter share. Among younger voters, Non-Partisan registration out-paces Democratic registration by 11 percent and Republican registration by 25 percent. In the rural counties, Non-Partisan registration is 10 percent higher than Democratic and is just four (4) percent behind Democratic share in both Clark and Washoe County. Voters not registered as either Democratic or Republican increased their lead as the largest bloc statewide, in Clark and Washoe County, and among voters 18 to 34 years of age.

The combined Non-Partisan and minor party voter share continued its dominance to where it is now the top voter share in over 50 percent of the state legislative districts (11 of 21 state senate; 52.38% and 24 of 42 state assembly; 57.14%)

State-Wide

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	11,301	1.87%	32.51%	-0.15%
R	11,921	2.15%	29.79%	-0.05%
NP	17,492	3.16%	30.12%	0.24%
IAP	2,382	2.98%	4.33%	0.03%
LIB	421	2.58%	0.88%	0.00%
Other	-371	-0.82%	2.36%	-0.08%
Total not D or R			37.70%	0.19%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Clark County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	8,738	1.87%	35.27%	-0.21%
R	8,617	2.53%	25.89%	0.02%
NP	13,346	3.26%	31.27%	0.24%
IAP	1,859	3.40%	4.19%	0.04%
LIB	274	2.67%	0.78%	0.00%
Other	-363	-1.02%	2.60%	-0.09%
Total not D or R			38.84%	0.19%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Washoe County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	2,296	2.38%	31.69%	-0.08%
R	2,219	2.20%	33.05%	-0.14%
NP	2,954	3.57%	27.43%	0.25%
IAP	374	2.72%	4.53%	0.00%
LIB	102	2.86%	1.17%	0.00%
Other	21	0.32%	2.12%	-0.05%
Total not D or R			35.25%	0.20%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Rural Counties (See rural county table below district tables)

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	267	0.65%	17.74%	-0.09%
R	1,085	0.98%	47.91%	-0.09%
NP	1,192	1.92%	27.01%	0.20%
IAP	149	1.31%	4.91%	0.01%
LIB	45	1.78%	1.10%	0.01%
Other	-29	-0.92%	1.34%	-0.03%
Total not D or R			34.36%	0.19%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

18 – 34 Year Old

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	4,201	2.59%	31.06%	-0.12%
R	3,150	3.41%	17.83%	0.08%
NP	7,309	3.32%	42.40%	0.14%
IAP	771	3.46%	4.30%	0.02%
LIB	179	2.51%	1.36%	-0.01%
Other	-150	-0.91%	3.04%	-0.12%
Total not D or R			51.11%	0.03%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

55+

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	3,087	1.18%	34.55%	-0.16%
R	4,243	1.43%	39.20%	-0.08%
NP	4,331	2.88%	20.22%	0.24%
IAP	706	2.26%	4.17%	0.03%
LIB	51	1.68%	0.40%	0.00%
Other	-31	-0.28%	1.46%	-0.03%
Total not D or R			26.25%	0.25%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

By district voter share changes.

Congressional Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	4	0	0
Republican	1	1	2
NP	0	4	0
IAP	0	4	0
LIB	0	0	4
Other	4	0	0

In all Congressional districts (100 percent of the districts) the number of voters not affiliated with either major party exceeds the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In three (75%) of the districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

State Senate Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	21	0	0
Republican	11	9	1
NP	0	21	0
IAP	1	17	3
LIB	4	7	10
Other	21	0	0

In all 21 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 11 (52.38%) of the 21 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

State Assembly Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	42	0	0
Republican	22	19	1
NP	0	42	0
IAP	5	33	4
LIB	10	17	15
Other	42	0	0

In all 42 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 23 (54.76%) of the 42 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

Rural Counties

Party	# Counties Lose Voter Share	# Counties Gain Voter Share	# Counties No Change
Democratic	10	4	1
Republican	10	5	0
NP	1	14	0
IAP	5	9	1
LIB	3	7	5
Other	12	1	2

How did registration trends impact the election outcome? I’ll be writing about that as soon as the secretary of state posts the final turnout data.

By Doug Goodman -Founder & Executive Director Nevadans for Election Reform – November 3, 2022

As I write this the two weeks of early voting ends tomorrow and election day is five days away. While Non-Partisan voter share has exceed that of the Republican Party among voters 18 to 34 years of age for quite some time and more recently in Clark County, October voter registration now puts GOP voter share below Non-Partisan statewide for the first time.

The combined Non-Partisan and minor party voter share continued its dominance to where it is now the top voter share in over 50 percent of the state legislative districts (11 of 21 state senate; 52.38% and 23 of 42 state assembly; 54.76%)

State-Wide

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	12,637	2.13%	32.66%	-0.21%
R	10,439	1.92%	29.84%	-0.25%
NP	22,937	4.32%	29.87%	0.44%
IAP	1,940	2.49%	4.31%	-0.01%
LIB	433	2.72%	0.88%	0.00%
Other	-56	-0.12%	2.44%	-0.07%
Total not D or R			37.50%	0.36%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Clark County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	8,704	1.90%	35.47%	-0.21%
R	5,985	1.79%	25.88%	-0.18%
NP	16,440	4.19%	31.03%	0.50%
IAP	1,120	2.09%	4.15%	-0.02%
LIB	221	2.20%	0.78%	0.00%
Other	-223	-0.62%	2.69%	-0.08%
Total not D or R			38.65%	0.40%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Washoe County

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	3,372	3.62%	31.77%	-0.08%
R	2,813	2.87%	33.19%	-0.32%
NP	4,213	5.37%	27.18%	0.39%
IAP	614	4.67%	4.52%	0.03%
LIB	157	4.61%	1.17%	0.01%
Other	166	2.58%	2.17%	-0.03%
Total not D or R			35.04%	0.39%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

Rural Counties (See rural county table below district tables)

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	561	1.38%	17.83%	-0.26%
R	1,641	1.50%	48.00%	-0.65%
NP	2,284	3.82%	26.82%	0.24%
IAP	206	1.85%	4.90%	-0.05%
LIB	55	2.23%	1.09%	-0.01%
Other	1	0.03%	1.37%	-0.04%
Total not D or R			34.17%	0.14%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

18 – 34 Year Old

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	1,964	1.22%	31.17%	-0.03%
R	1,113	1.22%	17.76%	-0.02%
NP	3,667	1.69%	42.26%	0.15%
IAP	239	1.08%	4.28%	-0.01%
LIB	76	1.08%	1.37%	0.00%
Other	-258	-1.54%	3.16%	-0.09%
Total not D or R			51.07%	0.05%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

55+

Party	Change in # Voters	% Change	% Voter Share	Difference in Voter Share %
D	3,137	1.21%	34.71%	-0.04%
R	3,711	1.27%	39.28%	-0.03%
NP	2,504	1.69%	19.97%	0.07%
IAP	551	1.80%	4.14%	0.02%
LIB	50	1.67%	0.40%	0.00%
Other	14	0.12%	1.49%	-0.02%
Total not D or R			26.01%	0.07%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.

By district voter share changes.

Congressional Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	4	0	0
Republican	4	0	0
NP	0	4	0
IAP	2	1	1
LIB	1	1	2
Other	4	0	0

In all Congressional districts (100 percent of the districts) the number of voters not affiliated with either major party exceeds the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In three (75%) of the districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

State Senate Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	21	0	0
Republican	21	0	0
NP	0	21	0
IAP	12	5	4
LIB	8	6	7
Other	21	0	0

In all 21 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 11 (52.38%) of the 21 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

State Assembly Districts

Party	# Districts Lose Voter Share	# Districts Gain Voter Share	# Districts No Change
Democratic	42	0	0
Republican	40	1	1
NP	0	42	0
IAP	19	11	12
LIB	15	13	14
Other	41	0	1

In all 42 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

In 23 (54.76%) of the 42 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.

Rural Counties

Party	# Counties Lose Voter Share	# Counties Gain Voter Share	# Counties No Change
Democratic	14	1	0
Republican	14	1	0
NP	1	14	0
IAP	7	4	4
LIB	7	5	3
Other	10	3	2

How this translate into election results is anybody’s guess. Jon Ralston, CEO of the Nevada Independent, breaks down turnout here.