By Doug Goodman -Founder & Executive Director Nevadans for Election Reform – December 31, 2022
With December voter registration numbers, voters registered as Non-Partisan or in minor parties closed out 2022 not only expanding their lead with an average growth of almost two percent over the year; Non-Partisan voter share growth averaged over two and one-half percent, but elected a new governor, lieutenant governor, and controller.
In addition to the three races mentioned above, voters not affiliated with either the Democratic or Republican Party impacted the margin of victory of many other races. NOTE: A breakout is included with this report.
State-Wide
| Party | Change in # Voters | % Change | % Voter Share | Difference in Voter Share % | 2021 – 2022 Voter Share Change |
| D | 632 | 0.10% | 32.39% | -0.12% | -1.54% |
| R | 404 | 0.07% | 29.67% | -0.12% | -0.21% |
| NP | 7,514 | 1.32% | 30.37% | 0.25% | 2.69% |
| IAP | 672 | 0.82% | 4.35% | 0.01% | -0.14% |
| LIB | 50 | 0.30% | 0.88% | 0.00% | -0.07% |
| Other | -174 | -0.39% | 2.34% | -0.02% | -0.73% |
| Total not D or R | 37.94% | 0.24% | 1.75% |
Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.
Clark County
| Party | Change in # Voters | % Change | % Voter Share | Difference in Voter Share % | 2021 – 2022 Voter Share Change |
| D | 563 | 0.12% | 35.11% | -0.16% | -1.71% |
| R | 365 | 0.10% | 25.77% | -0.12% | -0.22% |
| NP | 6,314 | 1.49% | 31.56% | 0.29% | 2.93% |
| IAP | 516 | 0.91% | 4.20% | 0.01% | -0.13% |
| LIB | 54 | 0.51% | 0.78% | 0.00% | -0.06% |
| Other | -138 | -0.39% | 2.57% | -0.02% | -0.81% |
| Total not D or R | 39.12% | 0.28% | 1.93% |
Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.
Washoe County
| Party | Change in # Voters | % Change | % Voter Share | Difference in Voter Share % | 2021 – 2022 Voter Share Change |
| D | 187 | 0.19% | 31.66% | -0.03% | -0.90% |
| R | 203 | 0.20% | 33.02% | -0.03% | 0.19% |
| NP | 421 | 0.49% | 27.48% | 0.05% | 1.49% |
| IAP | 123 | 0.87% | 4.55% | 0.03% | -0.07% |
| LIB | 5 | 0.14% | 1.17% | 0.00% | -0.09% |
| Other | -13 | -0.20% | 2.11% | -0.01% | -0.63% |
| Total not D or R | 35.32% | 0.07 | 0.71% |
Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.
Rural Counties (See rural county table below district tables)
| Party | Change in # Voters | % Change | % Voter Share | Difference in Voter Share % | 2021 – 2022 Voter Share Change |
| D | -118 | -0.28% | 17.65% | -0.09% | -1.48% |
| R | -164 | -0.15% | 47.73% | -0.17% | -0.57% |
| NP | 779 | 1.23% | 27.29% | 0.27% | 2.77% |
| IAP | 33 | 0.29% | 4.91% | 0.00% | -0.30% |
| LIB | -9 | -0.35% | 1.09% | -0.01% | -0.04% |
| Other | -23 | -0.73% | 1.32% | -0.01% | -0.39% |
| Total not D or R | 34.62% | 0.25% | 2.05% |
Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.
18 – 34 Year Old
| Party | Change in # Voters | % Change | % Voter Share | Difference in Voter Share % | 2021 – 2022 Voter Share Change |
| D | 34 | 0.02% | 30.88% | -0.18% | -2.31% |
| R | 41 | 0.04% | 17.73% | -0.10% | -0.80% |
| NP | 3,181 | 1.40% | 42.74% | 0.33% | 4.55% |
| IAP | 122 | 0.53% | 4.30% | 0.00% | -0.18% |
| LIB | 4 | 0.05% | 1.35% | -0.01% | -0.15% |
| Other | -122 | -0.75% | 3.00% | -0.04% | -1.11% |
| Total not D or R | 51.39% | 0.28% | 3.11% |
Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.
55+
| Party | Change in # Voters | % Change | % Voter Share | Difference in Voter Share % | 2021 – 2022 Voter Share Change |
| D | 183 | 0.07% | 34.46% | -0.09% | -1.10% |
| R | 260 | 0.09% | 39.10% | -0.10% | 0.29% |
| NP | 1,885 | 1.22% | 20.39% | 0.18% | 1.43% |
| IAP | 280 | 0.88% | 4.19% | 0.02% | -0.15% |
| LIB | 13 | 0.42% | 0.40% | 0.00% | -0.03% |
| Other | -10 | -0.09% | 1.46% | -0.01% | -3.89% |
| Total not D or R | 26.44% | 0.19% | 0.81% |
Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, other or not specified.
By district voter share changes.
Congressional Districts
| Party | # Districts Lose Voter Share | # Districts Gain Voter Share | # Districts No Change |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| NP | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| IAP | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| LIB | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Other | 3 | 1 | 0 |
In all Congressional districts (100 percent of the districts) the number of voters not affiliated with either major party exceeds the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.
In three (75%) of the districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.
State Senate Districts
| Party | # Districts Lose Voter Share | # Districts Gain Voter Share | # Districts No Change |
| Democratic | 20 | 1 | 0 |
| Republican | 20 | 1 | 0 |
| NP | 1 | 20 | 0 |
| IAP | 1 | 18 | 2 |
| LIB | 5 | 3 | 13 |
| Other | 20 | 0 | 1 |
In all 21 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.
In 13 (61.90%) of the 21 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.
State Assembly Districts
| Party | # Districts Lose Voter Share | # Districts Gain Voter Share | # Districts No Change |
| Democratic | 40 | 2 | 0 |
| Republican | 41 | 1 | 0 |
| NP | 2 | 40 | 0 |
| IAP | 2 | 30 | 10 |
| LIB | 12 | 8 | 22 |
| Other | 35 | 4 | 3 |
In all 42 districts (100%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.
In 25 (59.53%) of the 42 districts the percentage of voters not registered as Democratic or Republican is the leading group of voters.
Rural Counties
| Party | # Counties Lose Voter Share | # Counties Gain Voter Share | # Counties No Change |
| Democratic | 11 | 4 | 0 |
| Republican | 13 | 2 | 0 |
| NP | 2 | 13 | 0 |
| IAP | 7 | 8 | 0 |
| LIB | 6 | 6 | 3 |
| Other | 10 | 1 | 4 |
As we head into the legislative session, it is important to note that in sixty percent of legislative districts, voters registered as neither Democratic nor Republican is the largest voting bloc. Are legislators aware of this and how will that awareness, or lack thereof, affect the legislative process?
Impact of Non-Major Party Voters on 2022 General Election
Column Definition:
Percent – Percent of vote received
Party – Political Party of candidate
Reg % Party voter share
Diff Reg – Difference in voter share of major party candidates
Diff Vote to Reg – Difference of vote received to party voter share
Margin of Win – Percent of vote received, winner to second place candidate
Diff Margin of Win to Diff Ref – Comparison of margin of win to difference in voter share
Impact of non-major party voters can be deducted by comparing difference in voter share to margin of win. Example, Republican Party voter share is almost three percent lower than Democratic Party share yet Joe Lombardo won the race for governor by one and one-half percent.
| Governor | |||||||
| Percent | Party | Reg % | Diff Reg | Diff Vote to Reg | Margin of win | Diff margin of win -Diff reg | |
| BRIDGES, ED | 0.97% | IAP | 4.31% | -3.34% | |||
| DAVIS, BRANDON | 1.46% | LP | 0.88% | 0.58% | |||
| LOMBARDO, JOE | 48.81% | R | 29.84% | -2.82% | 18.97% | 1.51% | 4.33% |
| SISOLAK, STEVE | 47.30% | D | 32.66% | 14.64% | |||
| NONE OF THESE CANDIDATES | 1.46% | ||||||
| Lieutenant Governor | |||||||
| ANTHONY, STAVROS | 49.41% | R | 29.84% | -2.82% | 19.57% | 3.66% | 6.48% |
| CANO BURKHEAD, ELIZABETH “LISA” | 45.75% | D | 32.66% | 13.09% | |||
| DELAP, JOHN “TREY” | 0.78% | NP | 29.87% | -29.09% | |||
| HOGE, WILLIAM | 0.83% | IAP | 4.31% | -3.48% | |||
| TACHIQUIN, JAVI “TRUJILLO” | 1.13% | LP | 0.88% | 0.25% | |||
| NONE OF THESE CANDIDATES | 2.09% | ||||||
| State Controller | |||||||
| MATTHEWS, ANDY | 50.06% | R | 29.84% | -2.82% | 20.22% | 4.13% | 6.95% |
| PROFETA, JED W. | 1.52% | LP | 0.88% | 0.64% | |||
| SPIEGEL, ELLEN | 45.93% | D | 32.66% | 13.27% | |||
| NONE OF THESE CANDIDATES | 2.48% | ||||||
| United States Senator | |||||||
| Party | Reg % | Diff Reg | Diff Vote to Reg | Margin of win | Diff margin of win -Diff reg | ||
| PERCENT | |||||||
| CORTEZ MASTO, CATHERINE | 48.81% | D | 32.66% | 2.82% | 16.15% | 0.77% | -2.05% |
| LAXALT, ADAM PAUL | 48.04% | R | 29.84% | 18.20% | |||
| LINDEMANN, BARRY | 0.79% | NP | 29.87% | -29.08% | |||
| RUBINSON, BARRY | 0.51% | IAP | 4.31% | -3.80% | |||
| SCOTT, NEIL | 0.63% | LP | 0.88% | -0.25% | |||
| NONE OF THESE CANDIDATES | 1.22% | ||||||
| U.S. Representative in Congress, District 1 | |||||||
| CAVANAUGH, KEN | 2.47% | LP | 0.78% | 1.69% | |||
| ROBERTSON, MARK | 45.96% | R | 25.67% | 20.29% | |||
| TITUS, DINA | 51.57% | D | 35.60% | 9.93% | 15.97% | 5.61% | -4.32% |
| U.S. Representative in Congress, District 2 | |||||||
| AMODEI, MARK E. | 59.73% | R | 39.02% | 12.58% | 20.71% | 21.93% | 9.35% |
| BABER, DARRYL | 1.12% | LP | 1.15% | -0.03% | |||
| BEST, RUSSELL | 1.35% | IAP | 4.63% | -3.28% | |||
| KRAUSE, ELIZABETH MERCEDES | 37.80% | D | 26.44% | 11.36% | |||
| U.S. Representative in Congress, District 3 | |||||||
| BECKER, APRIL | 48.02% | R | 27.51% | 20.51% | |||
| LEE, SUSIE | 51.98% | D | 33.37% | 5.86% | 18.61% | 3.96% | -1.90% |
| U.S. Representative in Congress, District 4 | |||||||
| HORSFORD, STEVEN A. | 52.42% | D | 35.88% | 9.62% | 16.54% | 4.84% | -4.78% |
| PETERS, SAM | 47.58% | R | 26.26% | 21.32% | |||
| State Races | |||||||
| Secretary of State | |||||||
| Party | Reg % | Diff Reg | Diff Vote to Reg | Margin of win | Diff margin of win -Diff reg | ||
| AGUILAR, FRANCISCO “CISCO” | 48.95% | ||||||
| CRANE, ROSS | 0.87% | LP | 0.88% | -0.01% | |||
| HANSEN, JANINE | 1.72% | IAP | 4.31% | -2.59% | |||
| MARCHANT, JIM | 46.67% | R | 29.84% | 16.83% | |||
| NONE OF THESE CANDIDATES | 1.79% | ||||||
| State Treasurer | |||||||
| CONINE, ZACH | 47.70% | D | 32.66% | 2.82% | 15.04% | 1.70% | -1.12% |
| ELLIOTT, BRYAN | 1.59% | LP | 0.88% | 0.71% | |||
| FIORE, MICHELE | 46.00% | R | 29.84% | 16.16% | |||
| HENDRICKSON, MARGARET | 1.94% | IAP | 4.31% | -2.37% | |||
| NONE OF THESE CANDIDATES | 2.77% | ||||||
| Attorney General | |||||||
| CHATTAH, SIGAL | 44.36% | R | 29.84% | 14.52% | |||
| FORD, AARON D. | 52.25% | D | 32.66% | 2.82% | 19.59% | 7.89% | 5.07% |
| NONE OF THESE CANDIDATES | 3.39% | ||||||
| State Senate, District 2 | |||||||
| FLORES, EDGAR | 69.93% | D | 44.02% | 31.64% | 25.91% | 39.86% | 8.22% |
| HENDERSON, LEO | 30.07% | R | 12.38% | 17.69% | |||
| State Senate, District 8 | |||||||
| LOOP, MARILYN DONDERO | 50.72% | D | 32.72% | 2.94% | 18.00% | 1.44% | -1.50% |
| PAULOS, JOEY | 49.28% | R | 29.78% | 19.50% | |||
| State Senate, District 9 | |||||||
| Party | Reg % | Diff Reg | Diff Vote to Reg | Margin of win | Diff margin of win -Diff reg | ||
| BROWN, TINA | 46.55% | R | |||||
| SCHEIBLE, MELANIE | 53.45% | D | 34.71% | 9.95% | 18.74% | 6.90% | -3.05% |
| State Senate, District 10 | |||||||
| CUNNINGHAM, CHRIS | 3.64% | LP | 0.87% | 2.77% | |||
| DONATE, FABIAN | 55.54% | D | 36.99% | 16.84% | 18.55% | 14.72% | -2.12% |
| GRAVIET, PHILIP | 40.82% | R | 20.15% | 20.67% | |||
| State Senate, District 12 | |||||||
| ARRINGTON, CHERLYN | 47.53% | R | 27.59% | 19.94% | |||
| PAZINA, JULIE ANN | 52.47% | D | 33.33% | 5.74% | 19.14% | 4.94% | -0.80% |
| State Senate, District 13 | |||||||
| BUEHLER, MATTHEW R. | 38.43% | R | 23.25% | 15.18% | |||
| DALY, RICHARD “SKIP” | 61.57% | D | 36.79% | 13.54% | 24.78% | 23.14% | 9.60% |
| State Senate, District 14 | |||||||
| HANSEN, IRA | 100.00% | R | 43.09% | 56.91% | |||
| State Senate, District 16 | |||||||
| KRASNER, LISA | 60.35% | R | 40.52% | 13.73% | 19.83% | 20.70% | 6.97% |
| SIMS, AARON | 39.65% | D | 26.79% | 12.86% | |||
| State Senate, District 17 | |||||||
| TITUS, ROBIN L. | 100.00% | R | 49.02% | 50.98% | |||
| State Senate, District 20 | |||||||
| FOUTZ, BRENT | 35.59% | D | 24.79% | 10.80% | |||
| MILLS, BRANDON | 2.72% | LP | 0.71% | 2.01% | |||
| STONE, JEFF | 61.69% | R | 41.28% | 16.49% | 20.41% | 26.10% | 9.61% |
| State Senate, District 21 | |||||||
| Party | Reg % | Diff Reg | Diff Vote to Reg | Margin of win | Diff margin of win -Diff reg | ||
| LARSEN, APRIL | 44.21% | R | |||||
| OHRENSCHALL, JAMES | 55.79% | D | 40.30% | 19.62% | 15.49% | 11.58% | -8.04% |
| State Assembly, District 1 | |||||||
| BRINKLEY, GARLAND LEE | 42.60% | R | 25.86% | 16.74% | |||
| MCATEE-MACRAE, PATRICK “MAC” | 2.58% | NP | 28.40% | -25.82% | |||
| MONROE-MORENO, DANIELE | 54.82% | D | 38.44% | 12.58% | 16.38% | 12.22% | -0.36% |
| State Assembly, District 2 | |||||||
| BEDNARZ, JASON | 1.38% | LP | 0.77% | 0.61% | |||
| CHRISTENSON, NICK | 44.28% | D | 30.99% | 13.29% | |||
| KASAMA, HEIDI | 54.34% | R | 32.72% | 1.73% | 21.62% | 10.06% | 8.33% |
| State Assembly, District 3 | |||||||
| LEMACK, JOSHUA | 44.67% | R | 23.94% | 20.73% | |||
| TORRES, SELENA ELIZABETH | 55.33% | D | 37.79% | 13.85% | 17.54% | 10.66% | -3.19% |
| State Assembly, District 4 | |||||||
| BURNS, DARBY LEE | 37.38% | LP | 0.88% | 36.50% | |||
| MCARTHUR, RICHARD | 62.62% | R | 32.55% | 31.67% | 30.07% | 25.24% | -6.43% |
| State Assembly, District 5 | |||||||
| MILLER, BRITTNEY | 52.88% | D | 34.63% | 8.11% | 18.25% | 7.39% | -0.72% |
| MORGAN, RONALD | 1.64% | LP | 0.76% | 0.88% | |||
| QUINN, KELLY | 45.49% | R | 26.53% | 18.96% | |||
| State Assembly, District 6 | |||||||
| Party | Reg % | Diff Reg | Diff Vote to Reg | Margin of win | Diff margin of win -Diff reg | ||
| RIOS, KATHRYN “KAT” | 18.57% | R | |||||
| SUMMERS-ARMSTRONG, SHONDRA | 81.43% | D | 51.40% | 42.42% | 30.03% | 62.86% | 20.44% |
| State Assembly, District 7 | |||||||
| MILLER, CAMERON HOMER “C.H.” | 63.45% | D | 44.38% | 26.68% | 19.07% | 26.90% | 0.22% |
| PALMER, ANTHONY “TONY” | 36.55% | R | 17.70% | 18.85% | |||
| State Assembly, District 8 | |||||||
| Party | Reg % | Diff Reg | Diff Vote to Reg | Margin of win | Diff margin of win -Diff reg | ||
| LOGAN, JENANN | 44.07% | R | |||||
| NGUYEN, DUY | 55.93% | D | 33.93% | 10.54% | 22.00% | 11.86% | 1.32% |
| State Assembly, District 9 | |||||||
| FLEMING, RYAN PATRICK | 46.79% | R | 26.34% | 20.45% | |||
| YEAGER, STEVE | 53.21% | D | 32.95% | 6.61% | 20.26% | 6.42% | -0.19% |
| State Assembly, District 10 | |||||||
| HERNANDEZ, SANDIE “GISELA” | 41.81% | R | 21.61% | 20.20% | |||
| NGUYEN, ROCHELLE | 58.19% | D | 38.98% | 17.37% | 19.21% | 16.38% | -0.99% |
| State Assembly, District 11 | |||||||
| DURAN, BEATRICE “BEA” | 73.35% | D | 44.54% | 33.19% | 28.81% | 46.70% | 13.51% |
| KRATTIGER, ERIC | 26.65% | R | 11.35% | 15.30% | |||
| State Assembly, District 12 | |||||||
| CARTER, II, MAX E. | 50.94% | D | 38.01% | 12.98% | 12.93% | 1.88% | -11.10% |
| LARSEN, FLEMMING | 49.06% | R | 25.03% | 24.03% | |||
| State Assembly, District 13 | |||||||
| Party | Reg % | Diff Reg | Diff Vote to Reg | Margin of win | Diff margin of win -Diff reg | ||
| HIBBETTS, BRIAN | R | 7.54% | |||||
| RUCKER, WILL | 44.45% | D | 30.42% | 14.03% | |||
| State Assembly, District 14 | |||||||
| MOSCA, ERICA | 66.00% | D | 43.05% | 27.58% | 22.95% | 32.00% | 4.42% |
| STAMPER, SHAWN | 34.00% | R | 15.47% | 18.53% | |||
| State Assembly, District 15 | |||||||
| BANG, STEVEN D. | 37.47% | R | 16.41% | 21.06% | |||
| WATTS, HOWARD | 62.53% | D | 38.21% | 21.80% | 24.32% | 25.06% | 3.26% |
| State Assembly, District 16 | |||||||
| GONZALEZ, CECELIA | 53.86% | D | 35.92% | 12.49% | 17.94% | 7.72% | -4.77% |
| HOLDER, JESSE “JAKE” | 46.14% | R | 23.43% | 22.71% | |||
| State Assembly, District 17 | |||||||
| Party | Reg % | Diff Reg | Diff Vote to Reg | Margin of win | Diff margin of win -Diff reg | ||
| PAWLEY, III, EUGENE MICHAEL | R | ||||||
| THOMAS, CLARA “CLAIRE” | 65.52% | D | 41.67% | 23.93% | 23.85% | 31.04% | 7.11% |
| State Assembly, District 18 | |||||||
| CONSIDINE, VENICIA | 60.37% | D | 39.51% | 19.89% | 20.86% | 20.74% | 0.85% |
| DECORTE, CHRISTINE | 39.63% | R | 19.62% | 20.01% | |||
| State Assembly, District 19 | |||||||
| YUREK, THADDEUS “TOBY” | 100.00% | R | 42.78% | 57.22% | |||
| State Assembly, District 20 | |||||||
| Party | Reg % | Diff Reg | Diff Vote to Reg | Margin of win | Diff margin of win -Diff reg | ||
| LAROW, JOSIAH L. | LP | ||||||
| ORENTLICHER, DAVID | 59.44% | D | 39.92% | 20.44% | 19.52% | 21.71% | 1.27% |
| VAUGHAN, STAN | 37.73% | R | 19.48% | 18.25% | |||
| State Assembly, District 21 | |||||||
| MARZOLA, ELAINE | 52.41% | D | 33.39% | 4.69% | 19.02% | 4.82% | 0.13% |
| PETRICK, JON S. | 47.59% | R | 28.70% | 18.89% | |||
| State Assembly, District 22 | |||||||
| HARDY, MELISSA | 58.54% | R | 34.21% | 4.99% | 24.33% | 17.08% | 12.09% |
| RAMOS, RICK | 41.46% | D | 29.22% | 12.24% | |||
| State Assembly, District 23 | |||||||
| BRICKFIELD, ELIZABETH | 39.60% | D | 26.64% | 12.96% | |||
| GALLANT, DANIELLE | 58.87% | R | 39.92% | 13.28% | 18.95% | 19.27% | 5.99% |
| MANLEY, MERCY | 1.53% | LP | 0.72% | 0.81% | |||
| State Assembly, District 24 | |||||||
| KING, DORZELL | 34.09% | R | 20.84% | 13.25% | |||
| PETERS, SARAH | 65.91% | D | 37.88% | 17.03% | 28.03% | 31.82% | 14.79% |
| State Assembly, District 25 | |||||||
| KUMAR, SAM | 46.10% | R | 32.74% | 13.36% | |||
| LA RUE HATCH, SELENA | 53.90% | D | 35.17% | 2.43% | 18.73% | 7.80% | 5.37% |
| State Assembly, District 26 | |||||||
| DELONG, RICH | 71.71% | R | 40.02% | 12.47% | 31.69% | 43.42% | 30.95% |
| MITCHELL, REED | 28.29% | D | 27.55% | 0.74% | |||
| State Assembly, District 27 | |||||||
| Party | Reg % | Diff Reg | Diff Vote to Reg | Margin of win | Diff margin of win -Diff reg | ||
| ORTIZ, CARMEN L. | R | ||||||
| TAYLOR, ANGELA | 58.21% | D | 35.92% | 10.44% | 22.29% | 16.42% | 5.98% |
| State Assembly, District 28 | |||||||
| BROWN, CLINT | 32.58% | R | 13.39% | 19.19% | |||
| D’SILVA, REUBEN | 67.42% | D | 43.51% | 30.12% | 23.91% | 34.84% | 4.72% |
| State Assembly, District 29 | |||||||
| COHEN, LESLEY ELIZABETH | 53.14% | D | 33.72% | 6.63% | 19.42% | 6.28% | -0.35% |
| KNIGHTLY, RHONDA | 46.86% | R | 27.09% | 19.77% | |||
| State Assembly, District 30 | |||||||
| ANDERSON, NATHA C. | 55.21% | D | 35.71% | 10.07% | 19.50% | 13.77% | 3.70% |
| MCGEEIN, GARRETT | 3.36% | LP | 1.14% | 2.22% | |||
| RODRIGUEZ-ELKINS, RICCI | 41.44% | R | 25.64% | 15.80% | |||
| State Assembly, District 31 | |||||||
| DICKMAN, JILL | 100.00% | R | 40.27% | 59.73% | |||
| State Assembly, District 32 | |||||||
| HANSEN, ALEXIS M. | 100.00% | R | 46.23% | 53.77% | |||
| State Assembly, District 33 | |||||||
| GARRARD, JOHN “DOC” | 19.13% | D | 13.04% | 6.09% | |||
| GURR, BERT | 80.87% | R | 52.52% | 39.48% | 28.35% | 61.74% | 22.26% |
| State Assembly, District 34 | |||||||
| BILBRAY-AXELROD, SHANNON | 56.12% | D | 37.56% | 13.38% | 18.56% | 12.24% | -1.14% |
| BUTLER, STACY | 43.88% | R | 24.17% | 19.71% | |||
| State Assembly, District 35 | |||||||
| Party | Reg % | Diff Reg | Diff Vote to Reg | Margin of win | Diff margin of win -Diff reg | ||
| GORELOW, MICHELLE | 48.93% | D | |||||
| JONES, TIFFANY | 47.41% | R | 28.03% | 19.38% | |||
| ROBINSON, MINDY | 3.66% | LP | 0.84% | 2.82% | |||
| \ | |||||||
| State Assembly, District 36 | |||||||
| HAFEN, II, GREGORY T. | 100.00% | R | 40.29% | 59.71% | |||
| State Assembly, District 37 | |||||||
| BACKUS, SHEA | 50.49% | D | 34.08% | 2.96% | 16.41% | 2.57% | -0.39% |
| DEAVILLE, JACOB | 47.92% | R | 31.11% | 16.81% | |||
| TEDOFF, MARC | 1.60% | LP | 0.82% | 0.78% | |||
| State Assembly, District 38 | |||||||
| KOENIG, GREGORY S. | 100.00% | R | 47.24% | 52.76% | |||
| State Assembly, District 39 | |||||||
| GRAY, KEN | 70.17% | R | 50.52% | 31.54% | 19.65% | 40.34% | 8.80% |
| NOBLE, JANICE E. | 29.83% | D | 18.98% | 10.85% | |||
| State Assembly, District 40 | |||||||
| MCDANIEL, SHANNON C. | 37.96% | D | 25.96% | 12.00% | |||
| O’NEILL, PHILIP “PK” | 58.81% | R | 41.06% | 15.11% | 17.75% | 20.85% | 5.74% |
| TOLL, SAM | 3.23% | LP | 1.22% | 2.01% | |||
| State Assembly, District 41 | |||||||
| BODINE, PAUL | 46.07% | R | 26.47% | 19.60% | |||
| JAUREGUI, SANDRA | 51.77% | D | 33.28% | 6.81% | 18.49% | 5.70% | -1.11% |
| MCNAMARA, SEAN | 2.16% | LP | 0.87% | 1.29% | |||
| State Assembly, District 42 | |||||||
| BROWN-MAY, TRACY | 56.65% | D | 36.56% | 13.46% | 20.09% | 13.30% | -0.16% |
| FACEY, EDWARD “EDDIE” | 43.35% | R | 23.10% | 20.25% |