Democratic Party Continues to Take a Beating in Voter Registration

September voter registration data is out and the Democratic Party continues to suffer a steady loss of voter share across all demographics.

While Non-Partisan continues to show steady growth, the Republican Party also showed an increase in voter share in Clark County and among those 18 to 34 years of age. GOP voter share also remained unchanged across the state and in Washoe County.  Of the minor political parties, the Independent American Party had mixed raw number changes while holding a steady voter share, the Libertarian Party showed overall increases in raw numbers with no change in voter share, and the “other” category which includes the Green Party lost raw number and voter share.

It is important to note that Non-Partisan voter share in Washoe County topped 20 percent for the first time and the percentage of voters not affiliated with either the Democratic or Republican Party is closing in on 40 percent.

State-Wide

Party Change in # Voters % Change % Voter Share Difference in Voter Share %
D 695 0.12 39.08 -0.06
R 1,296 0.26 33.10 0.00
NP 1,856 0.59 21.28 0.07
Other 33 0.03 6.53 -0.02
Total not D or R 27.81 0.05

Other includes IAP, Lib, and 5 parties without ballot access.Change is # voters / voter share: IAP +0.25% / 0.00%; Lib +0.59% / 0.59%; other 5 parties -1.23% / -0.02%

Clark County

Party Change in # Voters % Change % Voter Share Difference in Voter Share %
D 1,376 0.31 42.66 -0.09
R 1,779 0.59 28.87 0.02
NP 2,060 0.89 22.25 0.08
Other 159 0.24 6.22 -0.02
Total not D or R 28.47 0.06

Other includes IAP, Lib, and 5 parties without ballot access. Change is # voters / voter share: IAP +0.55% /0.00%; Lib +0.98% / 0.00%; other 5 parties -1.35% / -0.02%

Washoe County

Party Change in # Voters % Change % Voter Share Difference in Voter Share %
D -530 -0.60 35.30 -0.03
R -486 -0.52 37.53 0.00
NP -181 -0.36 20.01 0.03
Other -88 -0.47 7.17 0.00
Total not D or R 27.18 0.03

Other includes IAP, Lib, and 5 parties without ballot access. Change is # voters / voter share: IAP -0.33% / 0.01%; Lib -0.32% / 0.00%; other 5 parties -1.18 / -0.01%

Rural Counties

Party Change in # Voters % Change % Voter Share Difference in Voter Share %
D -151 -0.34 23.88 -0.05
R 3 0.00 51.19 0.06
NP -23 -0.07 17.47 0.01
Other -38 -0.27 7.46 -0.01
Total not D or R 24.93 0.00

Other includes IAP, Lib, and 5 parties without ballot access. Change is # voters / voter share: IAP -0.39% / -0.02%; Lib +0.20% / 0.00%; other 5 parties 0.00% / 0.00%

18 – 34 Year Old

Party Change in # Voters % Change % Voter Share Difference in Voter Share %
D -164 -0.11 39.15 -0.07
R 258 0.29 22.60 0.05
NP 330 0.28 30.12 0.06
Other -134 -0.41 8.12 -0.04
Total not D or R 38.24 0.02

Other includes IAP, Lib, and 5 parties without ballot access. Change is # voters / voter share: IAP -0.02% / 0.00%; Lib +0.40% / 0.01%; other 5 parties -2.03% / -0.04%

55+

Party Change in # Voters % Change % Voter Share Difference in Voter Share %
D 626 0.26 39.59 -0.06
R 916 0.37 40.49 -0.01
NP 776 0.87 14.66 0.07
Other 141 0.44 5.26 0.00
Total not D or R 19.92 0.07

Other includes IAP, Lib, and 5 parties without ballot access. Change is # voters / voter share: IAP +0.41% / 0.00%; Lib +1.26% / 0.00%; other 5 parties 0.03% / 0.00%

Major party loses also continue in congressional and legislative districts.

Congressional Districts

Party # Districts Lose Voter Share # Districts Gain Voter Share # Districts No Change
Democratic 4 0 0
Republican 1 2 1
Non-Partisan 0 4 0
Other 4 0 0

CD 1, CD 2, and CD 4 continue to show the number of voters not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

State Senate Districts

Party # Districts Lose Voter Share # Districts Gain Voter Share # Districts No Change
Democratic 20 1 0
Republican 7 13 1
Non-Partisan 2 19 0
Other 13 4 4

In 16 districts (76.19%); an increase of one over August, 2017, the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties. Note the Democratic Party continues a major loss of voter share.

State Assembly Districts

Party # Districts Lose Voter Share # Districts Gain Voter Share # Districts No Change
Democratic 37 4 1
Republican 13 24 5
Non-Partisan 4 37 1
Other 26 7 9

In 31 districts (73.81%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties. While the overall number did not change, in AD 9 the percentage of those not affiliated with either major party now exceeds the percent registered in the Republican Party and in AD 42 the percent registered as Non-Partisan exceeds the GOP voter share. As in the senate, the Democratic Party continues to experience a major loss of voter share.

This trend in voter registration is not healthy for our state. Voters no longer feel represented by either major party and their departure means fewer voters; normally the ideological pure of each party, select the winner of an election given Nevada’s close primary system and the way legislative districts are created. Without major change, we could end up with a government of the few rather than the many.

Nevadans for Election Reform has begun preparation of the Greater Choice – Greater Voice initiative which will allow all voters to have a clear choice and loud voice in all elections. Click here for details.

5 Replies to “Democratic Party Continues to Take a Beating in Voter Registration”

  1. Great voter reg comparisons, as usual. Key is implementation of whatever plan you and Nevadans for Election Reform explore.
    Remember that we lead the nation in demographics of the electorate, so maybe the voter reg occurrence trends are normal metamorphoses!

  2. If the Democratic Party wants to gain voter share, it needs to enthusiastically embrace the platform Bernie Sanders espoused. I left the party over its leadership decisions throughout the primary, yet walked for HRC during GOTV. This party must recognize it cannot continue as it did. It must attend to the people, deal honestly and listen to the will of their members if they want to build membership. A reset is badly needed from Washington on down. Instead of shutting out Sanders, one of the most popular political figures in the country, they should embrace him. He is their hope for the future. They should admit it.

    1. Connie,
      “It must attend to the people, deal honestly and listen..” this is what RCV has a tendency to promote. Please take a look at the Greater Choice – Greater Voice initiative page. If it appeals to you please consider donating and / or volunteering. Thanks
      Doug

Comments are closed.