The Political Industry is Failing Itself and Us

In September, 2016 Harvard Business School released a report highlighting that the broken political climate in this county is the largest impediment to economic competitiveness. This September, in a report titled “Why Competition In The Politics Industry Is Failing America; A strategy for reinvigorating our democracy” they look at politics as if it were an industry and how lack of competition is failing to provide for the customers whose interests it is supposed to serve. The authors conclude that only through systemic changes can the political industry recover.

In analyzing the current state of our political environment, the authors find it is not the major political parties or current elected officials that bear the responsibility of failure. Rather it is the lack of competition in the current duopoly that puts us in the bind we are in. The parties and politicians are only acting as the system demands, responding to the interests of special interests and political dogma rather than what is in the best interest of all citizens. “We in America do not have government by the majority. We have government by the majority who participate.”

The report is broken down into six parts:

  • Part I assesses the broken system that has become the major barrier to progress in America.
  • Part II highlight a political system that is operating not a public institution but a private industry that sets its own rules fundamentally diminishing our democracy.
  • Part III describes the basic outcomes we should expect from a functioning political system, but are not achieving.
  • Part IV uses the Five Forces framework to show how the structure of the politics industry has led to the almost complete elimination of political competition thus not serving the needs of the average citizen.
  • Part V highlights the deliberate changes that have undermined our political system since the early 20th century.
  • Part VI lays out a strategy for reinvigorating our democracy by addressing the root causes of the current political dysfunction. Change will require action by us because our political system will not heal itself.

The report comes down to a few key points.

  • The system must deliver solutions to the problems facing the citizenry that are both practical and effective while also expanding opportunity.
  • The system must allow for action to replace rhetoric
  • Solutions must receive broad-based support from the citizenry over time
  • The system must guarantee respect for the Constitution and the rights of all

The current system provides none of these things.

The authors go on to stress the need to return competition to the political industry.  The importance of the average voter must become a priority over that of special interests and a small partisan party base. There must be an incentive to solve problems rather than stick to talking points. Barriers to competition must fall so accountability for achieving results can return. Unless changes are made, the current worsening trend will continue. Effective change must include: 

  • Restructuring the election process
  • Restructuring the governing process
  • Reforming the role of money in politics
  • Opening up competition

This report should not be a surprise. It is one more of a series by various organizations going back more than four years. All the reports highlight the growing divide caused by partisanship in this country to where it is now the most divisive issue facing our society. The word “tribal” is appearing more and more in the description.

Nevadans for Election Reform is proud to be putting together the Greater Choice – Greater Voice initiative. If passed by the voters, it will meet the challenges put forth by the authors of this report and return competition to the political industry of Nevada benefiting all Nevadans.

Democratic and Republican Party Could Be Minority Parties by 2018 General Election

As the trend in voter share favoring Non-Partisan and minor parties continues, (click here for August, 2017 data) it now appears that come the 2018 general election, more voters could be registered to vote in those categories than will be registered as either Democratic or Republican. If the change in voter share between August 2016 and August 2017 is applied, those registered as Non-Partisan or as a member of a minor party will be over 30 percent. Among voters 18 to 34 years old, that number will be over 40 percent. And while not quite reaching parity, this number will be over 25 percent in the rural counties and over 20 percent among those 55 years of age and older. These numbers are an estimate based on the past year’s change in voter share. My personal opinion is they will be higher. I doubt they’ll be lower.

Back to last month. On the outward appearance, minor parties appear to have fallen in August, 2017. However, the decrease is due to a glitch where the system assigned new voters who did not specify a party to “other” rather than “Non-Partisan.” Bottom line, the two major parties lost voter share.

Again, the GOP did not lose as badly as the Democratic Party. While the Democratic Party lost voter share across all demographics and almost all state senate and assembly districts, the GOP remained unchanged state-wide and had slight increases in voter share in Clark County, the rural counties, and among those 18 to 34 years of age. The GOP also gained voter share in more state senate and assembly district than they lost share.

State-Wide

Party Change in # Voters % Change % Voter Share Difference in Voter Share %
D 603 0.10 39.14 -0.09
R 1,657 0.34 33.10 0.00
NP 3,518 1.13 21.21 0.17
Other -988 -1.01 6.55 -0.09
Total not D or R     27.76 0.08

Other includes IAP, Lib, and 5 parties without ballot access. Change is # voters: IAP +0.40%; Lib +0.80%; other 5 parties -7.30%

Clark County

Party Change in # Voters % Change % Voter Share Difference in Voter Share %
D 1,011 0.23 42.75 -0.13
R 1,905 0.63 28.85 0.03
NP 3,499 1.53 22.17 0.22
Other -947 -1.43 6.24 -0.12
Total not D or R     28.41 0.10

Other includes IAP, Lib, and 5 parties without ballot access. Change is # voters: IAP +0.68%; Lib +0.93%; other 5 parties -9.47%

Washoe County

Party Change in # Voters % Change % Voter Share Difference in Voter Share %
D -104 -0.12 35.33 -0.04
R -116 -0.12 37.53 -0.05
NP 199 0.40 19.98 0.08
Other 34 0.19 7.16 0.01
Total not D or R     27.14 0.09

Other includes IAP, Lib, and 5 parties without ballot access. Change is # voters: IAP +0.33%; Lib +0.68%; other 5 parties -0.69

Rural Counties

Party Change in # Voters % Change % Voter Share Difference in Voter Share %
D -304 -0.68 23.94 -0.07
R -132 -0.14 51.13 0.12
NP -180 -0.55 17.46 -0.03
Other -75 -0.54 7.47 -0.01
Total not D or R     24.93 -0.04

Other includes IAP, Lib, and 5 parties without ballot access. Change is # voters: IAP -0.68%; Lib +0.36%; other 5 parties -0.73%

18 – 34 Year Old

Party Change in # Voters % Change % Voter Share Difference in Voter Share %
D -172 -0.11 39.22 -0.14
R 448 0.50 22.55 0.06
NP 1,231 1.04 30.06 0.24
Other -525 -1.59 8.16 -0.15
Total not D or R     38.22 0.09

Other includes IAP, Lib, and 5 parties without ballot access. Change is # voters: IAP +0.31%; Lib +0.58%; other 5 parties -7.47%

55+

Party Change in # Voters % Change % Voter Share Difference in Voter Share %
D 535 0.22 39.65 -0.06
R 858 0.35 40.50 -0.01
NP 999 1.13 14.60 0.11
Other -116 -0.36 5.25 -0.04
Total not D or R     19.85 0.07

Other includes IAP, Lib, and 5 parties without ballot access. Change is # voters: IAP +0.41%; Lib +1.01%; other 5 parties -6.15%

Major party loses also continue in congressional and legislative districts.

Congressional Districts

Party # Districts Lose Voter Share # Districts Gain Voter Share # Districts No Change
Democratic 4 0 0
Republican 1 2 1
Non-Partisan 0 4 0
Other 3 0 1

Both CD 1, CD 2, and CD 4 continue to show the number of voters not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

State Senate Districts

Party # Districts Lose Voter Share # Districts Gain Voter Share # Districts No Change
Democratic 20 1 0
Republican 6 13 2
Non-Partisan 1 19 1
Other 18 2 1

In 15 districts (71.4%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties. Note the Democratic Party continues a major loss of voter share. parties gained voter share in all districts.

State Assembly Districts

Party # Districts Lose Voter Share # Districts Gain Voter Share # Districts No Change
Democratic 38 4 0
Republican 17 23 2
Non-Partisan 3 38 1
Other 35 6 1

In 31 districts (73.81%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties. This is unchanged from last month. As in the senate, the Democratic Party continues to experience a major loss of voter share.

As Nevadans continue to lose confidence in the both the Democratic and Republican Party, look for exciting news in the near future from Nevadans for Election Reform.