Make Voting Easy…People Will Vote

Does making voting easy really encourage people to participate in elections? Will voters actually turn out in higher numbers if it’s easy? According to a report just released by Nonprofit Vote and the U.S. Elections Project, the answer is a resounding “YES”.

The report, titled “America Goes To The Polls 2018”looked at voter turnout in all 50 states, comparing the number of people who voted to the number of eligible voters (those of voting age not just the number registered to vote). What makes this report even more interesting is the 2018 mid-term election in November 2018 saw the largest overall turnout for a mid-term election in over 100 years. Bottom line, the states with the highest turnout make it easy. The states with the lowest turnout make it difficult.

Same Day Registration

Same day voter registration allows citizens who are eligible to vote but not registered to do so to register and vote. Currently 15 states allow same day registration on election day. An additional two states allow same day registration during early voting. Of those states, seven were in the top ten highest turnout states, including the top four. Conversely, seven of the bottom ten require voters to register no later than four weeks prior to the election.

Vote at Home (Vote by Mail)

Currently four states; Colorado, Oregon, Washington, and Utah. Of those, three ranked 2 (Colorado), 5 (Oregon), and 7 (Washington) in overall turnout. Utah, with an overall ranking of 23 had the highest turnout growth rate; 21.7% over 2014. Turnout for the 2018 primary election was also higher in those states compared to others; median 37.5% compared to 22%

Other notable achievements using vote at home:

Anchorage, Alaska experienced a record turnout after using all mail ballots in April 2018

California tested using all mail ballots in five counties. Turnout in those five was far greater than the remaining 53 counties

In their May 2018 primary, one county in Nebraska experienced 58% turnout compared to 24% statewide. Four additional counties implemented all mail ballots for the general election and saw similar results

Automatic Voter Registration

Automatic voter registration utilizes a state’s department of motor vehicles to automatically register or update a current voter registration easier. It is done by changing the process from an “opt-in” where a voter must request to register or update to an “opt-out” where registration or update is automatic unless the person declines. Currently five states have implemented automatic voter registration with another 12, including Nevada, pending implementation. States that use this process saw a median growth of registered voters of 11% between 2014 and 2018 as compared to 3% in all other states. California saw an increase in turnout of 18.8%, Georgia 16.4%

In Nevada, just over 80% of eligible voters are registered to vote.

The report goes on to look at the positive impacts of pre-registration for those 17 years old (Nevada does this), the use of non-partisan redistricting commissions to draw congressional, state, and local districts, and the use of ranked choice voting.

Not addressed in the report but worth introducing is the concept of online voting. Technologies such as blockchain are increasing the security of online transactions. The Utah Republican Party used online voting in their 2016 presidential caucus. West Virginia experimented with online voting in 2018. Also in 2018, Washoe County starting using blockchain to issue marriage certificates. The largest generation, the Millennials, have never not known computers. Younger Millennials have not been alive when there was not social media. Upcoming generations will most likely be totally reliant on technology to perform daily life activities. If we want these generations to fully participate in elections, the process must be familiar. I truly believe it a matter of when not if online voting will happen.

Voting must be convenient. It must be easy. It must be open to all eligible to participate. “America Goes To The Polls 2018”  provides results and a roadmap.

One Month Into Session Democratic Party Continues to Lose Voter Share

By Doug Goodman -Founder & Executive Director Nevadans for Election Reform

One month into the 80th regular session of the Nevada legislature, the Democratic Party continued to lose voter share in February. The only exception was among those 18 to 34 years of age and in the rural counties.  

The Democratic Party’s 2019 Legislative Session Nevada Blueprint includes “Expand access to the ballot box.” We will be following several election-related bills that are designed to do just that. The question remains, however, will the party’s leadership follow the same path as in the 2017 session?

Here are the numbers.

State-Wide

Party Change in # Voters % Change % Voter Share Difference in Voter Share %
D 1,917 0.31% 38.35% 0.00%
R 1,153 0.22% 33.36% -0.03%
NP 1,663 0.48% 22.03% 0.03%
IAP 382 0.48% 4.37% 0.01%
LIB 92 0.58% 1.01% 0.00%
Other -46 -0.33% 0.88% -0.01%
Total not D or R     28.29% 0.03

 Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, and others

Clark County

Party Change in # Voters % Change % Voter Share Difference in Voter Share %
D 2,092 0.45% 41.90% -0.04%
R 1,695 0.52% 29.25% -0.01%
NP 1,822 0.71% 22.93% 0.04%
IAP 435 0.76% 4.12% 0.01%
LIB 87 0.85% 0.92% 0.00%
Other 0 0.00% 0.87% 0.00%
Total not D or R     28.84% 0.05%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, and others

Washoe County

Party Change in # Voters % Change % Voter Share Difference in Voter Share %
D 3 0.00% 35.04% -0.06%
R 240 0.24% 36.89% 0.02%
NP 215 0.37% 21.17% 0.04%
IAP 42 0.47% 4.45% 0.01%
LIB 23 0.67% 1.27% 0.01%
Other -38 -1.16% 1.19% -0.02%
Total not D or R     28.08% 0.04%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, and others

Rural Counties

Party Change in # Voters % Change % Voter Share Difference in Voter Share %
D -178 -0.39% 22.86% 0.07%
R -782 -0.75% 51.69% -0.02%
NP -374 -1.03% 18.09% -0.06%
IAP -69 -0.61% 5.68% 0.01%
LIB -18 -0.79% 1.13% 0.00%
Other -8 -0.73% 0.55% 0.00%
Total not D or R     25.45% -0.05%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, and others

18 – 34 Year Old

Party Change in # Voters % Change % Voter Share Difference in Voter Share %
D 346 0.21% 38.70% 0.03%
R -142 -0.14% 22.71% -0.06%
NP 377 0.28% 31.00% 0.05%
IAP -4 0.08% 4.52% 0.00%
LIB 17 0.23% 1.73% 0.00%
Other -37 -0.63% 1.33% -0.01%
Total not D or R     38.58% 0.04%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, and other

55+

Party Change in # Voters % Change % Voter Share Difference in Voter Share %
D 1,005 0.40% 38.64% -0.03%
R 1,184 0.44% 41.26% -0.01%
NP 679 0.69% 15.00% 0.03%
IAP 223 0.69% 4.13% 0.01%
LIB 31 1.06% 0.45% 0.00%
Other 5 0.14% 0.52% 0.00%
Total not D or R     20.10% 0.04%

Other includes Green Party, Natural Law Party, and others

By district voter share changes.

Congressional Districts

Party # Districts Lose Voter Share # Districts Gain Voter Share # Districts No Change
Democratic 3 1 0
Republican 3 1 0
Non-Partisan 0 4 0
IAP 0 3 1
LIB 0 0 4
Other 2 0 2

CD 1, CD 2, and CD 4 (75 percent of the districts) continue to show the number of voters not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

State Senate Districts

Party # Districts Lose Voter Share # Districts Gain Voter Share # Districts No Change
Democratic 18 3 0
Republican 11 7 3
Non-Partisan 2 19 0
IAP 5 13 3
LIB 2 8 11
Other 9 1 11

In 16 districts (76.19%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

State Assembly Districts

Party # Districts Lose Voter Share # Districts Gain Voter Share # Districts No Change
Democratic 33 7 2
Republican 19 20 3
Non-Partisan 8 31 3
IAP 10 27 5
LIB 8 16 18
Other 18 5 19

In 34 districts (81%) the number of voters registered as Non-Partisan or the total number not affiliated with either major party is greater than or within 5% of the number of voters registered to one of the major parties.

We show voter registration data broken down statewide, Clark County, Washoe County, the rural counties, those 18 to 34 and those 55 and older. Across all these demographics except for those over 55 the percentage of voter not registered to either the Democratic or Republican Party is close to 30 percent; 20 percent for those over 55. For those 18 to 34, the percentage is close to 40 percent. Will the legislature acknowledge this continuing trend and pass the election bills presented to truly “expand access to the ballot box”? We’ll know in three months.